Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 79.45
Liaison Lindsey Kalkbrenner
Submission Date Feb. 27, 2020

STARS v2.2

Santa Clara University
PA-4: Reporting Assurance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00 Lindsey Kalkbrenner
Director
Center for Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Yes

Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
Internal review

The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:

Janice DeMonsi, Director of Recreation, Campus Recreation
Lisa Fabiny, International Student Advisor, Global Engagement Office
Carol Kelly, Interim Director Administrative Assistant, Center for Food Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Ali Reimer, Director of Market and Communication, College of Arts & Sciences
Kayla Wells, Program Director of Immersion, Ignatian Center for Jesuit Education
Stacy Connolly, Senior Research Analyst, Institutional Research


A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:

All STARS criteria is collected and documented by student interns working in the Center for Sustainability. Once a criteria is complete, the Director for the Center of Sustainability reviews it before sending credits out to responsible parties within the university to double-check and then affirm the information. Once the criteria has been approved and confirmed, Staff Associates do their primary reviews. The Director addresses their issues, then uploads credit content to the reporting. Staff Associates conduct their secondary reviews.


Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASH​E:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to ​submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
---

Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
---

Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to ​submitting it to AASHE​ (3rd review):
---

Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
---

Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.