| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 50.55 |
| Liaison | Aaron Klemm |
| Submission Date | Sept. 15, 2011 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
San Jose State University
PAE-12: Employee Satisfaction Evaluation
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.00 / 2.00 |
Loren
Lewis Project Coordinator Office of the President |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution evaluate employee satisfaction in a way that meets the criteria for this credit?:
Yes
None
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction:
Program: ACE (American Council on Education) Faculty Survey
Description: The ACE/Sloan Project conducted two surveys for employees on SJSU campus. The first survey focused on work/life balance for tenured and tenure-track faculty. The survey was administered one semester later to managers and staff at SJSU.
Methodology: A survey with closed-ended and open ended questions was sent out to all tenured & tenure-track faculty in Fall 2009. The response rate was 45%. The survey was replicated with managers and staff in Spring 2010. The response rate for the second survey was 41%.
Website: http://www.sjsu.edu/facultyaffairs/docs/Faculty_childcare_report_Fall_09.pdf
Program: American Council on Education Faculty Survey
Description: The ACE/Sloan Project conducted and participated in two surveys that are important for this report. The second survey focused on retention for tenure-track faculty. This survey was conducted by the Faculty Diversity Committee with support from the ACE/Sloan award.
Methodology: A survey with closed-ended and open ended questions was sent out to all tenure-track faculty in August/September 2010. The response rate was 80%.
Website: http://www.sjsu.edu/facultyaffairs/docs/FDCPreliminary_ReportDec15.pdf
None
The year the employee satisfaction evaluation was last administered:
2,010
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s employee satisfaction evaluation process is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.