Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 73.94 |
Liaison | Caitlin Steele |
Submission Date | July 21, 2023 |
San Francisco State University
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.52 / 3.00 |
caitlin
Steele Dr of Sust & Energy Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
153,000,000
US/Canadian $
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 9,027,000 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 29,835,000 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
Global Equity Manager [GMO Climate Change]: invests in companies expected to benefit from climate change mitigation/adaptation
Private Real Assets Manager [Vision Ridge]: sustainable real assets strategy focused on renewable energy, infrastructure, water, ag, natural resource companies and projects
Fixed Income Manager [Community Investment Management (CIM)]: small business loans to underserved communities
Private Real Assets Manager [Vision Ridge]: sustainable real assets strategy focused on renewable energy, infrastructure, water, ag, natural resource companies and projects
Fixed Income Manager [Community Investment Management (CIM)]: small business loans to underserved communities
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
25.40
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
Yes
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
None
The sustainable investment policy:
SFSU policy is attached
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
Yes
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
The Foundation’s investment policy integrates sustainability into 100% of the investment decisions. With commitment to net zero and a focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion, the investment policy provides clear direction to put social and environmental equity front and center in decision-making for investment managers
Proxy voting
Yes
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
The Foundation implements the portfolio with outside fund managers, that vote proxies on behalf of the Foundation. As part of due diligence when considering new investment managers, the Foundation considers their proxy voting approach, and where possible (e.g., separate accounts) will guide the manager to vote proxies in accordance with the ESG/sustainability objectives of the institution.
The Foundation will discuss with managers their proxy voting approach, and elect to have their shares voted in accordance with ESG objectives, where possible.
The Foundation will discuss with managers their proxy voting approach, and elect to have their shares voted in accordance with ESG objectives, where possible.
Shareholder resolutions
No
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
---
Divestment efforts and negative screens
Yes
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
The Foundation has committed to fully divest from fossil fuels over the next several years. More broadly, the Foundation has committed to a net zero objective, to reduce portfolio emissions by 50% by 2030 and 75% by 2035 and 100% by 2040. As part of this net zero approach, divestment from fossil fuel producing companies will be one approach.
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
100
Investor networks
Yes
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
The Foundation have been active participants in the Intentional Endowments Network (https://www.intentionalendowments.org/), “the leading mission-aligned investing network for higher education and other endowed institution.” The Foundation also participates in investor statements/campaigns when possible, including the Global Investor Statement to Governments on the Climate Crisis (https://theinvestoragenda.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/2022-Global-Investor-Statement-.pdf) organized by the Investor Agenda.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Provided by Cambridge Associates, fiscal year 2021-2022
https://news.sfsu.edu/news-story/sf-state-foundation-strengthens-commitment-racial-and-climate-justice-enhanced-investment
https://foundation.sfsu.edu/socially-responsible
https://news.sfsu.edu/news-story/sf-state-foundation-strengthens-commitment-racial-and-climate-justice-enhanced-investment
https://foundation.sfsu.edu/socially-responsible
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.