Overall Rating Bronze - expired
Overall Score 38.98
Liaison Ann Drevno
Submission Date Aug. 11, 2014
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.0

Saint Mary's College of California
OP-26: Water Use

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 0.09 / 4.00 Joe Kehoe
Director (Ret.)
Facilities Services
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Level of water risk for the institution’s main campus:
Medium to High

Total water use (potable and non-potable combined)::
Performance Year Baseline Year
Total water use 194,013.47 Cubic Metres 172,958.53 Cubic Metres

Potable water use::
Performance Year Baseline Year
Potable water use 194,013.47 Cubic Metres 172,958.53 Cubic Metres

Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users"::
Performance Year Baseline Year
Number of residential students 1,590 1,495
Number of residential employees 33 33
Number of in-patient hospital beds 0 0
Full-time equivalent enrollment 3,689 3,143
Full-time equivalent of employees 697 650
Full-time equivalent of distance education students 0 0

Gross floor area of building space::
Performance Year Baseline Year
Gross floor area 86,669.58 Square Metres 86,247.24 Square Metres

Area of vegetated grounds::
Performance Year Baseline Year
Vegetated grounds 5,809,475.13 Hectares 5,809,475.13 Hectares

Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date End Date
Performance Year July 1, 2012 June 30, 2013
Baseline Year July 1, 2010 June 30, 2011

A brief description of when and why the water use baseline was adopted:

In 2009-2010, SMC intentionally begin tracking water use for the purposes of the athletic field maintenance.

Water recycled/reused on campus, performance year:
0 Cubic Metres

Recycled/reused water withdrawn from off-campus sources, performance year:
0 Cubic Metres

A brief description of any water recovery and reuse systems employed by the institution:

A brief description of any water metering and management systems employed by the institution:

A brief description of any building retrofit practices employed by the institution, e.g. to install high efficiency plumbing fixtures and fittings:

With any renovation project of bathrooms or laundry rooms, the College seeks state of the art water conservation fixtures as replacement, including low flow toilets/waterless urinals, or electronic faucets and energy star rated laundry facilities.

A brief description of any policies or programs employed by the institution to replace appliances, equipment and systems with water-efficient alternatives:

See above.

A brief description of any water-efficient landscape design practices employed by the institution (e.g. xeriscaping):

The newest building on campus did include low flow watering system for the surrounding landscape. The College also established a practice of including such strategies (e.g. metering, low-flow systems) in any new construction.

A brief description of any weather-informed irrigation technologies employed by the institution:

A brief description of other water conservation and efficiency strategies employed by the institution:

The website URL where information about the institution’s water conservation and efficiency initiatives is available:

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.