| Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 35.35 |
| Liaison | Kimberly Post |
| Submission Date | Sept. 26, 2014 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Saint Joseph's College - ME
PA-10: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.59 / 1.00 |
Greg
Teegarden Professor Natural Sciences |
Has the institution conducted an employee satisfaction and engagement survey or other evaluation that meets the criteria for this credit?:
The percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample:
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
2013
Modern Think's "Great Colleges to Work For" survey sponsored by the Chronicle of Higher Education was administered to all faculty and staff.
2014
SJC Culture Audit was conducted to help determine the culture that currently exists within our SJC community. http://www.sjcme.edu/files/SJC_Culture_Audit_2014.pdf
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
The 2013 "Great Colleges to Work For" survey was conducted as part of ongoing process to improve overall employee satisfaction at the College. The survey provided data concerning a wide range of criteria has already resulted in a number of improvements. The survey will be conducted at an as yet undetermined date to continually identify opportunities for improvement, as well as, to celebrate advances.
The 2014 Culture audit consisted of a survey of opinions of the campus community to assist the SJC Wellness Team with providing the programming that employees want to have. It helps us identify what keeps employees motivated and happy and offers information on areas for changes or improvements. There were 132 Respondents.
The year the employee satisfaction and engagement evaluation was last administered:
The website URL where information about the institution’s employee satisfaction and engagement assessment is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.