|Submission Date||Oct. 13, 2017|
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing
|0.43 / 1.00||
Total expenditures on office paper :
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
|Expenditure Per Level|
|10-29 percent||0 US/Canadian $|
|30-49 percent||854.33 US/Canadian $|
|50-69 percent||0 US/Canadian $|
|70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label)||69849.21 US/Canadian $|
|90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled label)||0 US/Canadian $|
Percentage of expenditures on office paper that is 90-100 percent post-consumer recycled and/or agricultural residue content and/or FSC Recycled label:
A brief description of the time period from which the figures reported above are drawn (i.e. one-year time period or representative sample):
The figures reported are for the 2015 fiscal year. The figures only measure approximately a fourth of the office paper expenditures over the fiscal year, so the total number was multiplied by 4 and rounded to give a rough estimate for the total expenditures on office paper over that year.
In order to get a representative sample to calculate the percentages of expenditures on office paper with the various levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content, we calculated a representative sample size (represented by S) (https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size-calculator/) using a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of 5%. These are standard for the two variables. We then assign a randomly generated decimal value between 0 and 1 to each purchase and sorted the purchases by their associated random value. We then sample the first S purchases, which were randomly ordered.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Of the remaining 45.6% of paper expenditures which did not have a specified level of post-consumer recycled paper, 22.2% are certified by the Sustainable Forestry Initiative and 4.6% have other certifications including leadership forestry or are "processed-chlorine-free."
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.