Overall Rating | Bronze |
---|---|
Overall Score | 28.04 |
Liaison | Sam Edwards |
Submission Date | March 4, 2022 |
Quinnipiac University
PA-3: Inclusive and Participatory Governance
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.25 / 3.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Shared governance bodies
Yes or No | |
Students | Yes |
Academic staff | Yes |
Non-academic staff | Yes |
A brief description of the institution’s formal participatory or shared governance bodies:
Student Government: Act as liaisons between students and administration to fight for the resolution of students concerns and make those resolutions known to the QU community.
Faculty Senate: meets with university President to discuss current and long range issues to the university. Actions include approval of new education program and new academic policies.
Quinnipiac has a Staff Council for non-academic staff to participate in university issues and express concerns.
Faculty Senate: meets with university President to discuss current and long range issues to the university. Actions include approval of new education program and new academic policies.
Quinnipiac has a Staff Council for non-academic staff to participate in university issues and express concerns.
Part 2. Campus stakeholder representation in governance
43
Number of students representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
1
Number of academic staff representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
2
Number of non-academic staff representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
0
Part 3. Gender equity in governance
6
Percentage of official members of the highest governing body that are women:
13.95
Website URL where information about the institution’s highest governing body may be found:
Part 4. Community engagement bodies
No
A brief description of the campus-community council or equivalent body that gives external stakeholders a regular voice in institutional decisions that affect them:
---
Optional Fields
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s governance structure is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.