| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 58.08 |
| Liaison | Andrew D'Amico |
| Submission Date | March 13, 2015 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Princeton University
PA-10: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Jeanhee
Keyek Executive Assistant Office of Human Resources |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Has the institution conducted an employee satisfaction and engagement survey or other evaluation that meets the criteria for this credit?:
Yes
None
The percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample:
100
None
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
The Trustee Ad Hoc Committee on Diversity, as charged by President Tilghman in January 2012, as a component of its work, explored the quality of the employee experience at Princeton. In support of this effort, in partnership the Office of the Provost and the Office of Human Resources administered confidential online surveys in October 2012. Questions spanned the following topics as examples -
• Contentment with overall work experience
• Satisfaction with the work itself
• Princeton University and its leadership
• Diversity and inclusion
• Health, safety, and physical conditions
• Respectful treatment
• One’s immediate manager(s)
• One’s department
• Communications
• Teamwork
• Reward and recognition for high quality performance
• Performance management
• Compensation, benefits, and job security
• Professional development and advancement opportunities
None
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
Following the survey, customized results by unit were created, distributed and reviewed with each senior leader and in many instances, their leadership teams. Action was then taken within the units to address their specific results where they placed priority for improvements.
None
The year the employee satisfaction and engagement evaluation was last administered:
2,012
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s employee satisfaction and engagement assessment is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.