Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 61.84 |
Liaison | Carolyn Shafer |
Submission Date | March 4, 2022 |
Pratt Institute
OP-18: Waste Minimization and Diversion
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
3.93 / 8.00 |
Tony
Gelber Dir. Admin. Sustainability Facilities/Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Parts 1 and 2. Waste per person
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Materials recycled | 284 Tons | 1,002 Tons |
Materials composted | 22.10 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials donated or re-sold | 2.32 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator | 414 Tons | 2,339 Tons |
Total waste generated | 722.42 Tons | 3,341 Tons |
If reporting post-recycling residual conversion, provide:
Pratt changed carters to go with a new 'greener' carter and is complying with the NYC 'single stream recycling law.
This has resulted in less waste being recycled as comingling is occurring and waste is not being sent to a waste to energy plant.
* No materials were donated after March 11, 2020 as GiveTake was closed due to Covid and did not re-open until Sept. 9, 2021.
This has resulted in less waste being recycled as comingling is occurring and waste is not being sent to a waste to energy plant.
* No materials were donated after March 11, 2020 as GiveTake was closed due to Covid and did not re-open until Sept. 9, 2021.
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Period | Jan. 1, 2020 | Dec. 31, 2020 |
Baseline Period | Jan. 1, 2007 | Dec. 31, 2007 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
This baseline was selected as Pratt joined AASHE and used ICLEI to calculate GHG and also when Pratt joined the NYC Carbon Challenge called the Bloomberg 30/10.
2007 was the beginning of the program.
2007 was the beginning of the program.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 123 | 1,489 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 10 | 85 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 10 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 3,989 | 4,431 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 1,044 | 1,300 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 2,729 | 0 |
Weighted campus users | 1,771.25 | 4,691.75 |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user | 0.41 Tons | 0.71 Tons |
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
42.72
Part 3. Waste diverted from the landfill or incinerator
42.69
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
42.69
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No | |
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers | Yes |
Food | Yes |
Cooking oil | Yes |
Plant materials | Yes |
Animal bedding | No |
White goods (i.e. appliances) | No |
Electronics | Yes |
Laboratory equipment | No |
Furniture | Yes |
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste | No |
Scrap metal | Yes |
Pallets | Yes |
Tires | No |
Other (please specify below) | Yes |
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
Pratt has a GiveTake Program and an end of year Flea for Free Program.
These programs recover usable materials from both the academic waste stream and the Residence Hall waste stream and give them back to Pratt students.
In 2020 we recovered and reused approximately 4635.32 # of materials.
These programs recover usable materials from both the academic waste stream and the Residence Hall waste stream and give them back to Pratt students.
In 2020 we recovered and reused approximately 4635.32 # of materials.
Optional Fields
Active Recovery and Reuse
2.32
Tons
Recycling Management
Yes
Does the institution use dual stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
No
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
No
Contamination and Discard Rates
40
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed:
We have a program prior to end of semester exams and crits where the GiveTake student staff place signs and blue bags throughout the campus, adjacent to special bins and marked areas to recover all materials and products that can be reused by students.
The materials, paints, glues, wood, plastic metals etc. are collected and sorted in a GuiveTake shop for all students to use the following semester.
We recovered over 5 tons of materials in 2017.
We also conduct a Residence Hall Flea for Free before the end of the Spring semester where 'flea tables' are set up at several central locations and students exchange anything and everything from art supplies to shoes for their reuse. We estimate that in 2017 we reused about 2 tons of materials.
We estimate we reused about 2 tons of materials in this process.
The materials, paints, glues, wood, plastic metals etc. are collected and sorted in a GuiveTake shop for all students to use the following semester.
We recovered over 5 tons of materials in 2017.
We also conduct a Residence Hall Flea for Free before the end of the Spring semester where 'flea tables' are set up at several central locations and students exchange anything and everything from art supplies to shoes for their reuse. We estimate that in 2017 we reused about 2 tons of materials.
We estimate we reused about 2 tons of materials in this process.
Programs and Initiatives
The GiveTake Program and The Flea for Free Programs encourage reuse throughout campus.
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
Our solid waste carter estimates by volume and type of trash the campus pick ups and weighs the trucks as they enter the sorting facility.
Weights of all recycle/reuse products are provided on a monthly basis.
Weights of all recycle/reuse products are provided on a monthly basis.
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste:
We have institute the following:
- cleaning products are purchased in concentrated form so that water is not transported with the products.
- cleaning products are purchased in concentrated form so that water is not transported with the products.
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
The GiveTake program also takes office supplies and some used electronics for give back to students.
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse:
We have a service with a book dealer so that text books can be ordered and ready for use based on the number actually used. In addition the company will provide used books instead of new.
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption:
---
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials available online by default rather than printing them:
Almost 100% of the Institute's course catalogs, schedules, directories are on line.
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
As described previously the 'flea for free' event captures and reuses much of the residence hall move out waste.
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
Electronic products are handled by an electronics specialty company which attempts to reuse and recycle all parts of the electronic waste stream.
Website URL where information about the institution’s waste minimization and diversion efforts is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.