Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 55.07 |
Liaison | Carolyn Shafer |
Submission Date | March 5, 2021 |
Pratt Institute
OP-22: Rainwater Management
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.50 / 2.00 |
Tony
Gelber Dir. Admin. Sustainability Facilities/Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Which of the following best describes the institution’s approach to rainwater management?:
No written policies, plans or guidelines, but green infrastructure and LID practices are used
A brief description of the institution’s green infrastructure and LID practices:
We have been pursuing green infrastructure.
2 projects on landscapes have been designed to capture 100% of grounds stormwater on site - Cct Parking lot and Townhouses rear yards and courtyard.
We have reduced impermeable surfaces by reducing the widths of roads and paths and incorporating permeable surfaces.
We installed bio-swales system in a a fairly large parking lot which is not connected to the NYC stormwater system.
We have been controlling irrigation more accurately.
2 projects on landscapes have been designed to capture 100% of grounds stormwater on site - Cct Parking lot and Townhouses rear yards and courtyard.
We have reduced impermeable surfaces by reducing the widths of roads and paths and incorporating permeable surfaces.
We installed bio-swales system in a a fairly large parking lot which is not connected to the NYC stormwater system.
We have been controlling irrigation more accurately.
A copy of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines:
A brief description of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines that supports the responses above:
Installing permeable surfaces, installing bio-swales.
Reducing irrigation through better control.
Conversion of an exist well for the source of approx. 75% of irrigation water.
Reducing irrigation through better control.
Conversion of an exist well for the source of approx. 75% of irrigation water.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.