Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 55.07
Liaison Carolyn Shafer
Submission Date March 5, 2021

STARS v2.2

Pratt Institute
OP-16: Commute Modal Split

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 4.39 / 5.00 Tony Gelber
Dir. Admin. Sustainability
Facilities/Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
4,698

Full-time equivalent of employees:
1,103

Part 1. Student commute modal split

Has the institution gathered data about student commuting behavior?:
Yes

Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
94

A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
We have:
4698 FTE students.
1814 dorm students
sell 167 student parking passes
very little street parking, assume 10% of (4698-1814), drive 288
288/4698 drive = 6% drive or 94% walk, bike, mass transit.
This is based on student numbers and passes sold for 2019.

Part 2. Employee commute modal split

Has the institution gathered data about employee commuting behavior?:
Yes

Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
61

A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
We have approximately:
1103 fte faculty and staff
396 parking passes sold
add 10% street parking= 40
667 green
667/1103 = 61% green
this is for 2019

Optional Fields 

Percentage of students and employees that use the following as their primary mode of transportation:
Percentage of students (0-100) Percentage of employees (0-100)
Single-occupancy vehicle --- ---
Zero-emissions vehicle --- ---
Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode --- ---
Vanpool or carpool --- ---
Public transport or campus shuttle --- ---
Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped --- ---
Distance education / telecommute --- ---

Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.