Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 65.86
Liaison Briar Wray
Submission Date March 5, 2025

STARS v3.0

Portland Community College
OP-7: Dining Service Procurement

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 2.79 / 8.00 Stephania Fregosi
Sustainability Analyst
Academic Affairs
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

7.1 Percentage of food and beverage spend that meets sustainability criteria

Performance year for food and beverage purchasing:
2024

Percentage of food and beverage spend on products that are sustainably or ethically produced:
0.58

Percentage of food and beverage spend on plant-based foods:
29.28

Inventory of qualifying food and beverage purchases:
Description of the methodology used to determine the spend on products that are sustainably or ethically produced:

We analyzed our general ledger report and then analyzed the spend of our top vendors. We got an invenotry of purchases for the Fiscal Year 2023 from our top supplier, removed packaging and non-food items and then isolated a vendor list from both the general ledger report and the top supplier of foods.

We also removed line items for non-food items such as coffee cups, coffee supply and restaurant licenses and removed those dollar amounts from our total food spend. The remaining unalyzed spend was categorized as non-sustainable s a default.

In terms of sustainably or ethically produced foods, we were only able to recognize one brand (Equal Exchange) as being Fair Trade and a few products that were labeled as organic in the line items from our top supplier. A deeper dive into some of our specific coffee purchases might find more fair trade coffee in the future.

 


Description of the methodology used to determine the spend on plant-based foods:

We analyzed our general ledger report and then analyzed the spend of our top vendors. We got an inventory of purchases for the Fiscal Year 2023 from our top supplier, removed packaging and non-food items and then used the TASTE food calculator to determine plant-based spend. (We did a comparative analysis by hand and found the tool comparable to our own determination - the tool was better at identifying some challenging processed items that contained potentially animal based thickeners in beverages).

In our general ledger report, we also took a look at our invoices from a local produce company and determined that we weren't purchasing non-vegetable items (e.g. dressings). Similarly we noted that we had some line items for things like coffee cups, coffee supply and restaurant licenses and removed those dollar amounts from our total food spend. The remaining unanalyzed spend was categorized as animal products as a default.

 


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator OP 7.1:
1.79

7.2  Percentage of dining service spend with social impact suppliers

Does the institution have sufficient data on its dining service spend to pursue this indicator?:
Yes

Performance year for social impact dining service purchasing:
2024

Percentage of dining service spend with social impact suppliers:
9.21

Narrative and/or website URL providing an overview of the dining service program’s social impact suppliers:

We analyzed our general ledger report and then analyzed the spend of our top vendors. We got an invenotry of purchases for the Fiscal Year 2023 from our top supplier, removed packaging and non-food items and then isolated a vendor list from both the general ledger report and the top supplier of foods.

We also removed line items for non-food items such as coffee cups, coffee supply and restaurant licenses and removed those dollar amounts from our total food spend. The remaining unalyzed spend was categorized as non-sustainable s a default.

 

 


Description of the methodology used to determine the spend with social impact suppliers:

We used the general ledger report to identify our vendors.  We also worked with our food service team to identify the social impact suppliers. We screened the individual businesses from our major food supplier, US Foods and direct purchases in our general ledger and found purchases from businesses that met the following categories: employee owned, cooperatives (e.g. Tillamook, OceanSpray), b-corps, MSC/BAP and or ASC certified, GSI certified, employee stock option owned, short-supply chain (CA standard) and one hyper local/family owned businesses (a coffee roaster that works directly with the cofee growers, where a large % of the coffee sold is also fair trade).

 


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator OP 7.2:
1

Optional documentation

Notes about the information provided for this credit:

It's important to recognize that our dining services are only just becoming fully operational after reopening slowly post-covid. In the process, we have had much more limited food offerings in past years, particularly when it comes to smaller businesses.


Additional documentation for this credit:

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.