Overall Rating | Reporter - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | |
Liaison | Brian Eisenhauer |
Submission Date | Feb. 28, 2014 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Plymouth State University
PA-3: Governance
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
Reporter |
Brian
Eisenhauer Director Office of Environmental Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Do all enrolled students, regardless of type or status, have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies (through direct participation or the election of representatives)?:
Yes
None
A brief description of the mechanisms through which students have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies:
Student Senate, among other ways
None
Is there at least one student representative on the institution’s governing body who was elected by peers or appointed by a representative student body or organization?:
Yes
None
A brief description of student representation on the governing body, including how the representatives are selected:
represents elected student senate
None
Do students have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following?:
Yes or No | |
Establishing organizational mission, vision, and/or goals | No |
Establishing new policies, programs, or initiatives | No |
Strategic and long-term planning | Yes |
Existing or prospective physical resources | No |
Budgeting, staffing and financial planning | No |
Communications processes and transparency practices | --- |
Prioritization of programs and projects | No |
None
A brief description of the formal student role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years:
students are participants in master planning processes.
None
Do all staff, regardless of type or status, have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies (through direct participation or the election of representatives)?:
Yes
None
A brief description of the mechanisms through which all staff have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies:
staff have representatives on each through formal seats dedicated to their representation.
None
Is there at least one non-supervisory staff representative on the institution’s governing body who was elected by peers or appointed by a representative staff body or organization?:
Yes
None
A brief description of non-supervisory staff representation on the governing body, including how the representatives are selected:
Operating Staff are elected to serve.
None
Do non-supervisory staff have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following? :
Yes or No | |
Establishing organizational mission, vision, and/or goals | Yes |
Establishing new policies, programs, or initiatives | No |
Strategic and long-term planning | Yes |
Existing or prospective physical resources | Yes |
Budgeting, staffing and financial planning | Yes |
Communications processes and transparency practices | No |
Prioritization of programs and projects | Yes |
None
A brief description of the formal staff role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years:
participate in planning and on these committees
None
Do all faculty, regardless of type or status, have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies (through direct participation or the election of representatives)?:
Yes
None
A brief description of the mechanisms through which all faculty (including adjunct faculty) have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies:
faculty have dedicated seats in these workgroups, faculty are elected to serve
None
Is there at least one teaching or research faculty representative on the institution’s governing body who was elected by peers or appointed by a representative faculty body or organization?:
Yes
None
A brief description of faculty representation on the governing body, including how the representatives are selected:
Faculty are represented on the board.
None
Do faculty have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following?:
Yes or No | |
Establishing organizational mission, vision, and/or goals | No |
Establishing new policies, programs, or initiatives | No |
Strategic and long-term planning | Yes |
Existing or prospective physical resources | No |
Budgeting, staffing and financial planning | Yes |
Communications processes and transparency practices | No |
Prioritization of programs and projects | No |
None
A brief description of the formal faculty role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years:
faculty participate on the Planning Budget and Leadership group and participate in strategic planning and budgeting in that role.
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s governance structure is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.