Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 66.85 |
Liaison | Patrice Langevin |
Submission Date | Nov. 19, 2015 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Pitzer College
IN-4: Innovation 4
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Angelica
Gonzalez Apple Assistant Director Robert Redford Conservancy |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Title or keywords related to the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
Robert Redford Conservancy for Southern California Sustainability Student Fellows
None
A brief description of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
The Redford Conservancy not only serves as a locus to facilitate action on Pitzer’s sustainability commitments, but it is also a leader in innovative academic programming and interdisciplinary education around environmental challenges. Academically driven by the liberal arts, and guided by Pitzer College’s core values of social responsibility and environmental sustainability, we engage interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches to environmental problem solving. The Redford Conservancy aims to promote both the longevity of Southern California’s natural environment, and the well-being of its peoples.
The Redford Conservancy Fellows are a group of Pitzer students who have demonstrated academic excellence and a deep commitment to sustainability and environmental justice. While originally developed as an independent study, the Fellows program has evolved to include twelve students, whose work includes: coordinating an environmental speaker series, engaging Pitzer students in co-curricular sustainability programming, conducting outreach to local communities on issue of environmental justice, and participating in the planning process of the Conservancy building.
None
A brief description of any positive measurable outcomes associated with the innovation (if not reported above):
---
None
A letter of affirmation from an individual with relevant expertise:
None
Which of the following STARS subcategories does the innovation most closely relate to? (Select all that apply up to a maximum of five):
Yes or No | |
Curriculum | Yes |
Research | Yes |
Campus Engagement | Yes |
Public Engagement | Yes |
Air & Climate | --- |
Buildings | --- |
Dining Services | --- |
Energy | --- |
Grounds | --- |
Purchasing | --- |
Transportation | --- |
Waste | --- |
Water | --- |
Coordination, Planning & Governance | --- |
Diversity & Affordability | --- |
Health, Wellbeing & Work | --- |
Investment | --- |
None
Other topic(s) that the innovation relates to that are not listed above:
---
None
The website URL where information about the innovation is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.