Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 76.41 |
Liaison | Krista Bailey |
Submission Date | Dec. 12, 2023 |
Pennsylvania State University
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
3.00 / 3.00 |
Krista
Bailey Sustainable Campus Strategist Sustainability Institute |
Part 1. Institution-wide sustainable procurement policies
A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
The policies, guidelines or directives:
19. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - Fulfilling the mission of The Pennsylvania State University for those we serve requires the highest standards of integrity, responsibility, and respect, and we encourage our suppliers to aspire to those same standards, particularly when on campus or engaging with members of the University community. The University has adopted the Global Sullivan Principles of Social Responsibility. We also encourage our suppliers to adopt and follow these principles.
Also, in its Information for Suppliers (https://purchasing.psu.edu/suppliers), Penn State states that "Minority, small, disadvantaged, women-owned, and environmentally responsible businesses are encouraged to participate."
Additionally, in its information for Suppliers about the quote/ proposal process (http://purchasing.psu.edu/quoteproposal-submission), Penn State describes "Environmental Alternatives: The University is committed to environmental stewardship, conserving natural resources and preserving the environment. We encourage suppliers to identify products, services, or processes that promote environmental stewardship. In addition to the requested bid, suppliers are encouraged to offer an additional bid for products, services, or processes that are more environmentally friendly. Such products or services should be bid as an alternate to the requested bid. Any exceptions or deviations from the original specifications must be clearly identified. The environmental benefits must be clearly identified with supporting data. Benefits may include: Reduced life cycle costs, reduced energy consumption, recycled content, recyclability, extended product life, and decreased maintenance."
Moreover, Penn State's Purchasing Team has been critical in supporting Penn State's Waste Stream Task Force. This work targets the waste hierarchy starting with reduction, reuse, and recycling. Final recommendations include developing a Sustainable Purchasing Policy and reflect best practices from the industry and benchmarks from other large higher-ed institutions.
A summary of the procurement recommendations can be found at https://wastestream.psu.edu/procurement/ and a draft of the policy is at https://wastestream.psu.edu/files/2020/02/AppendixII-Proposed_Sustainable_Purchasing_Policy.pdf.
Part 2. Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
Design Professionals are required to design systems for optimal operating efficiency, reliability, and flexibility with the lowest life cycle cost. For HVAC systems, the Design Professional shall carefully evaluate and properly select the most effective equipment type and to best suit the needs of the application with emphasis on minimizing operating and life cycle cost, rather than minimizing size and first cost. An Economic / LCCA is required to be performed and documentation submitted to confirm selection of base systems and potential options for alternate bids. In addition, at a minimum, facilities at Penn State are required to achieve at least 30% energy savings over the latest version of the ASHREA 90.1 standard. Documentation of compliance is required and verified. See https://sites.psu.edu/designandconstructionstandards/23-00-00/ 1. General/C/iii and 3. High-Performance Energy-Efficiency/B. Equipment Selection
Moreover, Penn State's Office of Physical Plant has developed a Sustainability for the Built Environment working group dedicated to evaluating construction designs from a sustainability lens and life-cycle costs. This group has evaluated current best practices from sustainable construction standards (LEED, Living Building Challenge, and Passive House) and looks to implement and create standards based on those best practices.
Part 3. Product-specific sustainability criteria
To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products and/or services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above.
Chemically intensive products and services
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:
Consumable office products
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for consumable office products:
Penn State Policy AD34 (https://policies.psu.edu/policies/ad34), University Recycling Program, is currently under review. It has two goals that relate to procurement: (1) To encourage the development and adoption of specifications which eliminate barriers to and encourage the purchase of products that contain post-consumer recycled materials, and (2) To develop and implement a policy that will promote waste reduction at the University to include recycling, reuse, composting, and green purchasing. Penn State's Proposed Sustainable Purchasing Policy (https://wastestream.psu.edu/files/2020/02/AppendixII-Proposed_Sustainable_Purchasing_Policy.pdf) includes criteria and recommendations for purchasing consumable office products.
Furniture and furnishings
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for furniture and furnishings:
Under Materials and Resources, MR Credit: Furniture and Medical Furnishings, the criteria require the use at least 30% (1 point) or 40% (2 points), by cost, of all freestanding furniture and medical furnishings (e.g., mattresses, foams, panel fabrics, cubicle curtains, window coverings, other textiles) that meet the criteria in one of the following three options: Minimal Chemical Content, Testing and Modeling of Chemical Content, and/or Multi-attribute Assessment of Products"
Information Technology (IT) and equipment
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for Information Technology (IT) and equipment:
Food service providers
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food service providers:
Garments and linens
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
Professional service providers
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional service providers:
Transportation and fuels
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:
Penn State Policy Policy BS 21 for the PROCUREMENT AND USE OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS AT UNIVERSITY PARK (https://policies.psu.edu/policies/bs21) establishes procedures for proposal, review, and approval of new EV charging stations on campus.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.