Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 74.49 |
Liaison | Krista Bailey |
Submission Date | Dec. 17, 2020 |
Pennsylvania State University
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.84 / 5.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
4,466,800,000
US/Canadian $
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 1,750,000 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
Partly in response to student advocacy, Penn State conducted a study several years ago to evaluate investment managers who are "environmental, social and governance" (ESG) focused as compared to their non-ESG peers. This study led Penn State to hire a management firm which invests using an ESG strategy. About $175M of the investment pool is currently subject to this investment strategy.
In addition, funds under other management strategies likely include investments that would fall into the "sustainability investment" category; however it was not practicable to search through individual investments that are overseen by a variety of managers within different funds. Furthermore, lack of a universally-recognized definition/list of sustainability investments further complicates this task.
In addition, funds under other management strategies likely include investments that would fall into the "sustainability investment" category; however it was not practicable to search through individual investments that are overseen by a variety of managers within different funds. Furthermore, lack of a universally-recognized definition/list of sustainability investments further complicates this task.
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
0.04
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
No
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
---
None
The sustainable investment policy:
---
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
No
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
---
Proxy voting
Yes
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
Penn State authorizes its investment managers to vote on its behalf. Therefore the managers who are focused on ESG investments (described above) are engaged in proxy voting on behalf of Penn State in a way that supports their environmental, social and governance goals.
Shareholder resolutions
No
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
---
Divestment efforts and negative screens
No
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
---
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
---
Investor networks
Yes
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
Penn State investment managers network and collaborate with other institutional investors and investment managers to understand best practices and current trends with respect to ESG investing.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Long Term Investment Pool value is for June 30, 2019.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.