| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 45.06 |
| Liaison | Saiyare Refaei |
| Submission Date | Sept. 13, 2010 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Pacific Lutheran University
OP-12: Office Paper Purchasing
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 2.00 |
Danyelle
Thomas Sustainability Assistant Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase recycled content office paper?:
Yes
None
The URL where the recycled paper policy, directive, or guidelines are posted:
None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed :
Everything printed with University letterhead is mandated to be 30% post-consumer recycled paper. In addition, everything that is printed through university printing is automatically duplexed, and printed on paper that is between 10-30% recycled material. They encourage the use of scanning and faxing instead of copying. They have also moved to the use of multi-purpose machines (scanning, faxing, copying, printing) in order to reduce the amount of electricity consumed. The Admission viewbook has been printed on 100% recycled material since 2005.
None
Does the institution wish to pursue points for Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on recycled paper)?:
No
None
Expenditures on 10-29 percent recycled-content office paper :
---
None
Expenditures on 30-49 percent recycled-content office paper :
---
None
Expenditures on 50-69 percent recycled-content office paper :
---
None
Expenditures on 70-89 percent recycled-content office paper (required if claiming points for Part 2):
---
None
Expenditures on 90-100 percent recycled-content office paper :
---
None
Total expenditures on office paper :
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
PLU does not have a central purchasing office, which makes it really difficult to measure the amount of paper that is purchased and consumed.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.