Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 74.49 |
Liaison | Brandon Trelstad |
Submission Date | Dec. 8, 2021 |
Oregon State University
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.74 / 4.00 |
Molly
Brown Sr. Director, Communications & Stewardship OSU Foundation |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
819,553,272
US/Canadian $
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 2,928,882 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 168,198,892 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 1,177,435 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
Public holdings reported above map to the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF or the iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened ETF. Private holdings include underlying assets in funds such as the RRG Sustainable Water Impact Fund, Vision Ridge Sustainability Asset Fund II/III, and Blue Bear Fund II, among others.
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
21.02
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
No
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
---
None
The sustainable investment policy:
---
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
No
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
---
Proxy voting
No
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
---
Shareholder resolutions
No
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
---
Divestment efforts and negative screens
No
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
---
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
0
Investor networks
Yes
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
Foundation staff monitors and shares best practices and networks with peer institutions regarding issues and emerging trends in responsible investing. Primary networks include the Council for the Advancement and Support of Education (CASE)'s Institutionally Related Foundations group, Associated Governing Boards (AGB), and the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO).
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.