| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 47.53 |
| Liaison | Kirsten Gabrielsen |
| Submission Date | Jan. 14, 2019 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Orange County Community College
PA-12: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Christine
Work Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Officer Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Yes
Percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample (0-100):
100
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
The following areas were assessed in the 2018 Faculty and Staff Opinion Survey:
Job Satisfaction and Support
Professional Development
Policies, Resources and Efficiency
Supervisor/Chair Relationships
Administration
Facilities
Communication and Collaboration
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
The results of the Faculty and Opinion Survey are presented to Cabinet. Each area of the college is asked to review the responses and identify areas of improvement. These improvement initiatives, depending on the planning timeline, are incorporated into either departmental plans/initiatives, divisional level efforts, as well as strategic planning efforts. All results are shared college-wide during Assembly as well as are accessible via the college's shared drive.
Issues raised by the evaluation have led to
-increased opportunities for more internal professional development courses to all employees. Examples include "How to include Sustainability in my Courses" and "
-increased accessibility for faculty and staff to be involved in larger budgetary decisions. Example include an Open Forum on ranking proposals going through the College's Planning and Budgeting system
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
There is not a particular webpage.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.