Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 55.56
Liaison Katie Beitz
Submission Date Aug. 25, 2021

STARS v2.2

Oklahoma State University
OP-18: Waste Minimization and Diversion

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 4.06 / 8.00 Kristeena Blaser
Sustainability Coordinator
Energy Services
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Parts 1 and 2. Waste per person

Figures needed to determine total waste generated (and diverted):
Performance Year Baseline Year
Materials recycled 473.91 Tons 135 Tons
Materials composted 103.06 Tons 0 Tons
Materials donated or re-sold 2.70 Tons 0 Tons
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion 0 Tons 0 Tons
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator 2,793 Tons 4,795.32 Tons
Total waste generated 3,372.67 Tons 4,930.32 Tons

If reporting post-recycling residual conversion, provide:

A brief description of the residual conversion facility:
---

Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date End Date
Performance Period Jan. 1, 2019 Dec. 31, 2019
Baseline Period July 1, 2005 June 30, 2006

If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:

A brief description of when and why the waste generation baseline was adopted:
---

Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Number of students resident on-site 5,667 7,077
Number of employees resident on-site 323 400
Number of other individuals resident on-site 341 0
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment 21,629 21,235
Full-time equivalent of employees 4,962 4,677
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education 435 247
Weighted campus users 21,455.50 21,118

Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Total waste generated per weighted campus user 0.16 Tons 0.23 Tons

Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
32.67

Part 3. Waste diverted from the landfill or incinerator

Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator by recycling, composting, donating or re-selling, performance year:
17.19

Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
17.19

In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers Yes
Food Yes
Cooking oil Yes
Plant materials Yes
Animal bedding Yes
White goods (i.e. appliances) Yes
Electronics Yes
Laboratory equipment Yes
Furniture Yes
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste Yes
Scrap metal Yes
Pallets Yes
Tires Yes
Other (please specify below) Yes

A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
Textiles and cardboard are included in the above waste figures.

Not include are: refrigerants, lab chemicals, batteries, fluorescent lamps, construction and demolition waste. These items have been recycled but not quantified.

Optional Fields 

Active Recovery and Reuse

Materials intended for disposal but subsequently recovered and reused on campus, performance year:
---

Recycling Management 

Does the institution use single stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Yes

Does the institution use dual stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Yes

Does the institution use multi-stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Yes

Contamination and Discard Rates 

Average contamination rate for the institution’s recycling program:
16

A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed:
The key quality control mechanism we employ to minimize contamination is to provide tours of the sorting facilities that accept our materials and visually show the contamination. Another deterrent is spreading the word across campus that all recyclable material from campus is hand sorted in our rural location. Making the connection to human hands discourages our major contaminant, food waste/residue and minor contaminants that pose danger, such as glass and sharps.

Programs and Initiatives 

A brief description of the institution's waste-related behavior change initiatives:
In addition to frequent MRF tours, we use signage at bins, at recycle dumpsters, as hall flyers and on residential hall magnets. We have found that clustering bins changes behavior in that less contamination is found in clustered recycle bins and less recycling is found in clustered trash cans.

A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
In spring 2019, students replicated a 2013 OSU waste stream analysis with 6 campus buildings. They found the recycling rate, contamination rate, and compared these across campus. Then they proposed practical ideas for how to increase the recycling rate and decrease the amount (volume and weight) of trash that OSU sends to the landfill each year.

A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste:
---

A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
The Office of Asset Management assists university departments in effective management and accountability of University property. The Office issues a monthly list of surplus items and whatever items are not moved among University departments or other State agencies are transferred to the Surplus Warehouse where they are displayed for OSU employees to take for use on campus as needed. When the Warehouse is too crowded, usually once per quarter, items are sold at public auction.

A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse:
Faculty, staff and graduate students are strongly encouraged to procure used furnishings, equipment, electronics and other goods from the surplus warehouse. Photos of surplus items are shared via social media and in-person presentations. There is also a webpage dedicated to the exchange of surplus. Several residential halls utilize Buy-Sell-Trade exchanges that they create via GroupMe.

A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption:
Library and computer lab printers are set on default to print double-sided.

A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials available online by default rather than printing them:
OSU offers course catalogs, course schedules and directories online. The student newspaper, the O'Colly is online as are departmental newsletters. The University Imaging Office scans files for offices that wish to go paperless. All classes have the option to submit assignments online rather than in person.

A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
A Move-In Recycling program was implemented for the first time in August 2013 for students living in both Single Student Housing and Family and Graduate Student Housing. Cardboard continues to be collected for recycling each year at move-in. Real Pokes Pass It On is a Move-out program that collects clothing, books, and household items and donates them to charity either directly or via a fall resale program. Family & Graduate Student Housing also holds a yard sale. Various groups hold book drives at the end of each semester.

A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
Many materials are recovered and reused on campus at the departmental level including used office supplies, sturdy boxes, textiles, rags, bricks and pavers, pallets, lab chemicals, corrugated plastic signs, and scrap lumber.

Website URL where information about the institution’s waste minimization and diversion efforts is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.