Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 27.21 |
Liaison | Jonathan Miller |
Submission Date | May 8, 2017 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Nova Southeastern University
OP-9: Landscape Management
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.00 / 2.00 |
Seth
Mangasarian Director Physical Plant |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total campus area (i.e. the total amount of land within the institutional boundary):
319
Acres
Figures required to calculate the total area of managed grounds:
Area (double-counting is not allowed) | |
Area managed in accordance with an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program that uses a four-tiered approach | 0 Acres |
Area managed in accordance with an organic land care standard or sustainable landscape management program that has eliminated the use of inorganic fertilizers and chemical pesticides, fungicides and herbicides in favor of ecologically preferable materials | 0 Acres |
Area managed using conventional landscape management practices (which may include some IPM principles or techniques) | 319 Acres |
Total area of managed grounds | 319 Acres |
If the total area of managed grounds is less than the total campus area, provide:
---
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program
0
If reporting an IPM program, provide:
---
A brief description of the IPM program:
---
Organic Program
0
If reporting an organic program, provide:
---
Optional Fields
---
A brief description of the institution's approach to hydrology and water use:
---
A brief description of the institution's approach to materials management and waste minimization (e.g. composting and/or mulching on-site waste):
---
A brief description of the institution's approach to energy-efficient landscape design:
---
A brief description of other sustainable landscape management practices employed by the institution (e.g. use of environmentally preferable landscaping materials, initiatives to reduce the impacts of ice and snow removal, wildfire prevention):
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.