Overall Rating	Gold
Overall Score	73.40
Liaison	Dayna Cook
Submission Date	Nov. 6, 2023

STARS v2.2

Northern Arizona University
PA-3: Inclusive and Participatory Governance

Status	Score	Responsible Party
	1.75 / 3.00	Dayna McKay Data Analyst Office of Sustainability

"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Part 1. Shared governance bodies

Does the institution have formal participatory or shared governance bodies through which the following stakeholders can regularly participate in the governance of the institution?:

	Yes or No
Students	Yes
Academic staff	Yes
Non-academic staff	Yes

A brief description of the institution’s formal participatory or shared governance bodies:

Associated Students of NAU (ASNAU-undergraduate student government), Graduate Student Government (GSG), Faculty Senate, and The Staff Advisory Council (SAC).

Part 2. Campus stakeholder representation in governance

Total number of individuals on the institution’s highest governing body:

Number of students representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:

Number of academic staff representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:

Number of non-academic staff representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:

Part 3. Gender equity in governance

Number of women serving as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:

Percentage of official members of the highest governing body that are women:

41.67

Website URL where information about the institution’s highest governing body may be found:

https://www.azregents.edu/about/leadership/board-members

Part 4. Community engagement bodies

Does the institution host or support one or more formal bodies through which external stakeholders have a regular voice in institutional decisions that affect them?:

A brief description of the campus-community council or equivalent body that gives external stakeholders a regular voice in institutional decisions that affect them:

While NAU does not host one all-encompassing community engagement body required by the credit language, we would like to highlight our public Sustainability-focused forum. The Sustainability Forum is representative of the Office of Sustainability and is the primary avenue for public input and engagement around campus sustainability initiatives. The forum is committed to connecting the NAU and Flagstaff communities through sharing information between NAU and the Flagstaff community to discuss sustainability strategies. The forum is open to the community and meets monthly from 12:00 p.m. to 1:15 p.m.

Optional Fields

Number of people from underrepresented groups serving as official members of the institution’s highest governing body.:

---

Website URL where information about the institution’s governance structure is available:

---

Additional documentation to support the submission:

---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:

---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.