| Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 37.63 |
| Liaison | Emma Shipalesky |
| Submission Date | March 23, 2012 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Northern Alberta Institute of Technology
PAE-12: Employee Satisfaction Evaluation
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.00 / 2.00 |
Terry
Wald Director Human Resources |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution evaluate employee satisfaction in a way that meets the criteria for this credit?:
Yes
None
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction:
Individual departments often conducted employee satisfaction/employee engagement surveys specific to their employees. These surveys have been replaced one annual, comprehensive engagement survey for all employees of the institute. Both on-line and hard-copy survey methodology is available to staff, dependent on their needs/skills. All responses are guaranteed confidentiality and data analysis by our Institutional Research department or external consultants, preserve the confidentiality. Participants are also allowed to provide specific comments on specific areas requiring improvement across the institute. These comments are aggregated, analyzed for common themes and provided to NAIT's Executive and Director of Human Resources for consideration. Major themes requiring action are determined, and auctioned. Full transparency of the process is ensured: an introduction of the survey and its purpose is provided in communications from the President/CEO; full survey results are posted on NAIT's staff portal; an analysis/short list of improvement themes identified through the written responses are posted, and initiatives undertaken to address the issues are communicated to all staff. Updates are provided as appropriate.
None
The year the employee satisfaction evaluation was last administered:
2,011
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s employee satisfaction evaluation process is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.