Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 61.60 |
Liaison | Megan Curtis-Murphy |
Submission Date | Feb. 28, 2023 |
Northeastern University
OP-9: Landscape Management
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.00 / 2.00 |
Megan
Curtis-Murphy Director of Campus Sustainability & Engagement Climate Justice & Sustainability Hub |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total campus area:
51.80
Hectares
Figures required to calculate the total area of managed grounds:
Area (double-counting is not allowed) | |
Area managed organically, without the use of inorganic fertilizers and chemical pesticides, fungicides and herbicides | 0 Hectares |
Area managed in accordance with an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program that uses selected chemicals only when needed | 15.14 Hectares |
Area managed using conventional, chemical-based landscape management practices | 0 Hectares |
Total area of managed grounds | 15.14 Hectares |
If the total area of managed grounds is less than the total campus area, provide:
Footprint of buildings, ball fields, and hardscape.
Organic program
0
If reporting an organic program, provide:
In addition to the use of environmentally safe control materials, organic fertilizers are used when soil temperatures are such that microbial activity is taking place, thereby feeding the soil as well as the plant itself.
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program
100
If reporting an IPM program, provide:
---
A brief description of the IPM program:
The University’s Landscape Program follows Integrated Pest Management principles as an integrated framework for all landscaping decisions and turf management. Integrated Pest Management is an ecologically-based approach to the utilization of controls that protect and enhance turf and applies the same approach and techniques to turf as it does for similar plant-growing materials. Principles of organic production support healthy practices that aim to increase the quality and durability of the environment, through specific management and production methods including management methods selected to restore and sustain ecological stability in the surrounding environment. Organic – and IPM management – is implemented in four application phases: spring, early summer, late summer/early fall, and late fall. The IPM plan provides for the following, strictly-adhered to guidelines: applications take place before anticipated rain to "water-in" materials; walks must be blown of any granular materials; and sensitive areas around wetlands receive no applications. IPM program components include:
• Monitoring/scouting: Physical examination for the determined pest;
• Thresholds: Decisions are made about acceptable, and unacceptable thresholds, and actions are taken if levels are reached that could be potentially damaging to plant health and aesthetic appearance;
• Controls Chosen: Insect infestations would first be addressed by adjusting cultural practices, followed by environmentally safe biological controls, and finally, the application of pesticides;
• Initial response to control an insect infestation would be: adjusting cultural practices; choosing environmentally safe biological controls; and pesticide application;
• The physical application is based as/where needed, and the needed approach would be “spot” applications only.
• Monitoring/scouting: Physical examination for the determined pest;
• Thresholds: Decisions are made about acceptable, and unacceptable thresholds, and actions are taken if levels are reached that could be potentially damaging to plant health and aesthetic appearance;
• Controls Chosen: Insect infestations would first be addressed by adjusting cultural practices, followed by environmentally safe biological controls, and finally, the application of pesticides;
• Initial response to control an insect infestation would be: adjusting cultural practices; choosing environmentally safe biological controls; and pesticide application;
• The physical application is based as/where needed, and the needed approach would be “spot” applications only.
Optional Fields
Northeastern University’s Boston campus has officially been recognized as a Level II Arboretum by ArbNet, a nonprofit dedicated to helping create and conserve arboreta around the world. Northeastern is now the only university in Boston to have an arboretum on its campus. The Arboretum covers 11.5 acres of green space out of the 72 acre Boston campus, including 1,471 individual trees representing over 100 different species; 5,404 shrubs; and 141 woody plant species, all of which shelter the walkways between buildings and surround the open green spaces. The land on which much of the campus is built was surrounded by waterways that were filled in during the 19th century. It was a challenge, but through trial and error, NU Landscaping found species that work. To be accredited, an arboretum needs to have a strategic plan, a governing board, public programming, and an inventory of every tree and woody plant on the grounds. Level II-accredited arboreta have 100 species, varieties or cultivars of trees or woody plants, an arboretum collections policy describing the development and professional management of plants, and have enhanced educational and public programming. Additional information is available on the Arboretum website: https://facilities.northeastern.edu/arboretum
A brief description of the institution's approach to hydrology and water use:
A portion of the University is in a designated water conservation district dictating a respect for the Muddy River, part of the Charles River Watershed. Toward that end the University considers its stormwater and takes concerted efforts to utilize Low Impact Design principles in all of its campus planning, such as the use of bioswales and groundwater recharge.
The University also utilizes numerous methods for retaining stormwater on-site and with slow release: capturing rainwater for re-use, redirecting for irrigation purposes and taking deliberate action to both avoid flooding while utilizing best practices to conserve water.
The University also utilizes numerous methods for retaining stormwater on-site and with slow release: capturing rainwater for re-use, redirecting for irrigation purposes and taking deliberate action to both avoid flooding while utilizing best practices to conserve water.
A brief description of the institution's approach to landscape materials management and waste minimization:
As an urban campus, the University doesn't have adequate options for on-site reuse or composting, however operation guidelines require sourcing from local organic composting facilities as well as utilizing the same for our vegetated debris.
A brief description of the institution's approach to energy-efficient landscape design:
Like most of the University's building systems, the landscape is also automated with lighting and irrigation systems. These systems utilize sensors for activation and report malfunctions in order to be addressed in a timely manner.
A brief description of other sustainable landscape management practices employed by the institution:
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s sustainable landscape management program is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.