| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 65.49 |
| Liaison | Jun-Ming Chen |
| Submission Date | Oct. 29, 2021 |
National Tsing Hua University
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
4.25 / 5.00 |
Fu-Ren
Lin Professor Institute of Service Science, National Tsing Hua University |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
16,917
Full-time equivalent of employees:
2,767
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
95.50
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
NTHU students mainly live in the dormitory on campus. The general way of commuting is by motorcycles, cars, public transportation, walking, etc. Therefore, the total number of students is deducted from the number of students applying for car passes, which is the proportion of students who use sustainable commuting as the main mode of transportation.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
20.70
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
The total number of employees deducts the number of applications for car passes, that is, the proportion of employees who use sustainable commuting as their main mode of transportation.
Optional Fields
| Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
| Single-occupancy vehicle | 4.50 | 79.30 |
| Zero-emissions vehicle | --- | --- |
| Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 47.60 | 14.90 |
| Vanpool or carpool | --- | --- |
| Public transport or campus shuttle | --- | --- |
| Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 26 | 49 |
| Distance education / telecommute | --- | --- |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.