Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 68.89 |
Liaison | Natalie Sobrinski |
Submission Date | Feb. 27, 2024 |
Muhlenberg College
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.73 / 3.00 |
Kent
Dyer Chief Business Officer Office of the Treasurer |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
326,300,000
US/Canadian $
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 7,600,000 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 7,500,000 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
The Muhlenberg College Investment Committee conducted analysis alongside their Outsourced Chief Investment Officer to better understand the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) characteristics of the College’s current investment portfolio. By focusing on the public equity exposure in the portfolio, the Committee was able to develop a stronger comprehension of the ESG risks and opportunities embedded in the largest asset class within the College’s total investment pool.
Subsequently, the Investment Committee decided to include Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) language into the Investment Policy Statement and allocate 4.6% of global equities to an investment portfolio that specifically targets high quality ESG investments including Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance and community development financial institutions. The Committee will continue to monitor the ESG sensitivity of the portfolio and potentially look at increasing the exposure to ESG or Sustainable Investments across asset classes over time.
Subsequently, the Investment Committee decided to include Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) language into the Investment Policy Statement and allocate 4.6% of global equities to an investment portfolio that specifically targets high quality ESG investments including Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance and community development financial institutions. The Committee will continue to monitor the ESG sensitivity of the portfolio and potentially look at increasing the exposure to ESG or Sustainable Investments across asset classes over time.
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
4.63
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
No
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
---
None
The sustainable investment policy:
Muhlenberg has included ESG language into their Investment Policy Statement. It is not publicly available. The ESG language in the IPS was constructed alongside Muhlenberg’s Outsourced Chief Investment Officer and is applicable to the selection of managers for the targeted ESG allocation.
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
Yes
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
The ESG language in the IPS was constructed alongside Muhlenberg’s Outsourced Chief Investment Officer and is applicable to the selection of managers for the targeted ESG allocation. The policy is applied through targeted ESG investments, but not through proxy voting or shareholder advocacy. Muhlenberg has included ESG language into their Investment Policy Statement. It is not publicly available.
Proxy voting
No
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
---
Shareholder resolutions
No
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
Muhlenberg College has not filed or co-filed one or more shareholder resolutions that address sustainability during the past three years
Divestment efforts and negative screens
No
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
---
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
---
Investor networks
Yes
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
Muhlenberg’s Outsourced Chief Investment Officer participates in various networks across ESG investing and impact investing.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.