| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 66.23 |
| Liaison | Jody Jones |
| Submission Date | March 18, 2024 |
Mount Royal University
IN-1: Academy-Industry Connections
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.00 / 0.50 |
Jorden
Dye Program Admin IES |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution require that all significant consulting contracts be reported to a standing committee charged with reviewing and managing individual and institutional conflicts of interest?:
Yes
The policy language that requires that all significant consulting contracts be reviewed for conflicts of interest:
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
1. GUIDING PRINCIPLES
1.1 Employees will make every effort not to engage in activities where there may be an
Actual or Perceived Conflict of Interest unless those conflicts are disclosed in writing,
assessed, and appropriately addressed, in accordance with the procedures in this
Code.
1.2 Conflicts of Interest may be permitted only if they can be managed in a way that is
compliant with legislation and considers, protects and serves the interests, integrity
and reputation of the University, and will withstand the test of reasonable and
independent scrutiny.
1.3 Employees must disclose any personal, business, commercial or financial interest
which the Employee and/or immediate Family may have, that could be considered an
Actual or Perceived Conflict of Interest with the Employee’s role at the University.
CONCURRENT EMPLOYMENT, SELF-EMPLOYMENT, APPOINTMENTS AND
BUSINESSES
5.1 Employees may participate in outside appointments, businesses, undertakings or
concurrent employment, including self-employment, provided that such activity does
not cause an Actual or Perceived Conflict of Interest, and:
a. does not interfere with the performance of the Employee’s duties or availability for
work;
b. does not involve the use of University property, equipment, tools, computer,
materials, supplies or personnel; or
c. is not performed in such a way as to appear to represent the University.
5.2 Prior to accepting any employment, appointment, business or undertaking, Employees
are required to notify their Supervisor in writing about the nature of such employment,
appointment, business or undertaking. The Supervisor must then review the
disclosure for any Actual or Perceived Conflicts of Interest.
1. GUIDING PRINCIPLES
1.1 Employees will make every effort not to engage in activities where there may be an
Actual or Perceived Conflict of Interest unless those conflicts are disclosed in writing,
assessed, and appropriately addressed, in accordance with the procedures in this
Code.
1.2 Conflicts of Interest may be permitted only if they can be managed in a way that is
compliant with legislation and considers, protects and serves the interests, integrity
and reputation of the University, and will withstand the test of reasonable and
independent scrutiny.
1.3 Employees must disclose any personal, business, commercial or financial interest
which the Employee and/or immediate Family may have, that could be considered an
Actual or Perceived Conflict of Interest with the Employee’s role at the University.
CONCURRENT EMPLOYMENT, SELF-EMPLOYMENT, APPOINTMENTS AND
BUSINESSES
5.1 Employees may participate in outside appointments, businesses, undertakings or
concurrent employment, including self-employment, provided that such activity does
not cause an Actual or Perceived Conflict of Interest, and:
a. does not interfere with the performance of the Employee’s duties or availability for
work;
b. does not involve the use of University property, equipment, tools, computer,
materials, supplies or personnel; or
c. is not performed in such a way as to appear to represent the University.
5.2 Prior to accepting any employment, appointment, business or undertaking, Employees
are required to notify their Supervisor in writing about the nature of such employment,
appointment, business or undertaking. The Supervisor must then review the
disclosure for any Actual or Perceived Conflicts of Interest.
Does the institution prohibit faculty, staff, students, postdoctoral fellows, medical residents, and other academic professionals from engaging in industry-led “ghostwriting” or “ghost authorship”?:
No
The policy language that prohibits industry-led “ghostwriting” or “ghost authorship”:
---
Does the institution prohibit participation in sponsored research that restricts investigator access to the complete study data or that limits investigators’ ability to verify the accuracy and validity of final reported results?:
No
The policy language that prohibits sponsored research that restricts investigator access or verification:
---
Does the institution ban confidential corporate research?:
No
The policy language that bans confidential corporate research:
---
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.