| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 63.22 |
| Liaison | Jessica Russell |
| Submission Date | Oct. 17, 2019 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Mount Royal University
IN-18: Pre-Submission Review
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 0.50 |
Jessica
Muraca Project Analyst Facilities Management |
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Caillie Mutterback, Special Event and Employment Development Assistant
Career Services, Mount Royal University
A brief description of the review process:
1. Data was organized and collected by designated staff, students, and faculty. Once satisfied with data input, the report was submitted to Kimberly Smith, Research and Planning Consultant, Institutional Analysis & Planning.
2. Kimberly Smith provided an internal review for institutional accuracy.
3. The STARS committee reviewed and addressed recommendations.
4. Caillie Mutterback, Special Event and Employment Development Assistant, Career Services, provided a formal review using the STARS Review Template.
5. The STARS committee reviewed and addressed recommendations.
Which of the following describes the review process?:
Affirmation from the reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from an additional reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 2nd reviewer:
Affirmation from a 3rd reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 3rd reviewer:
Affirmation from a 4th reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 4th reviewer:
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.