Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 63.22
Liaison Jessica Russell
Submission Date Oct. 17, 2019
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

Mount Royal University
IN-18: Pre-Submission Review

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 0.50 / 0.50 Jessica Muraca
Project Analyst
Facilities Management
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:

Caillie Mutterback, Special Event and Employment Development Assistant
Career Services, Mount Royal University


A brief description of the review process:

1. Data was organized and collected by designated staff, students, and faculty. Once satisfied with data input, the report was submitted to Kimberly Smith, Research and Planning Consultant, Institutional Analysis & Planning.
2. Kimberly Smith provided an internal review for institutional accuracy.
3. The STARS committee reviewed and addressed recommendations.
4. Caillie Mutterback, Special Event and Employment Development Assistant, Career Services, provided a formal review using the STARS Review Template.
5. The STARS committee reviewed and addressed recommendations.


Which of the following describes the review process?:
Internal reviewer(s)

Affirmation from the reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from an additional reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---

Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 2nd reviewer:
---

Affirmation from a 3rd reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---

Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 3rd reviewer:
---

Affirmation from a 4th reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---

Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 4th reviewer:
---

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.