Overall Rating | Bronze |
---|---|
Overall Score | 26.56 |
Liaison | Noah Hughes |
Submission Date | Dec. 31, 2022 |
Modesto Junior College
OP-18: Waste Minimization and Diversion
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
4.37 / 8.00 |
Judy
Lanchester Director of Facilities Planning and Operations Facilities Planning and Operations |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Parts 1 and 2. Waste per person
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Materials recycled | 3.73 Tons | 35.39 Tons |
Materials composted | 142.78 Tons | 104.78 Tons |
Materials donated or re-sold | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator | 84.94 Tons | 157.34 Tons |
Total waste generated | 231.45 Tons | 297.51 Tons |
If reporting post-recycling residual conversion, provide:
---
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Period | July 1, 2020 | June 30, 2021 |
Baseline Period | July 1, 2018 | June 30, 2019 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
---
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 28 | 28 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 1 | 1 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 3 | 3 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 13,155.38 | 13,454.18 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 763.50 | 763.50 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 8,451.30 | 3,850.74 |
Weighted campus users | 4,110.93 | 7,785.46 |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user | 0.06 Tons | 0.04 Tons |
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
0
Part 3. Waste diverted from the landfill or incinerator
63.30
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
63.30
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No | |
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers | Yes |
Food | Yes |
Cooking oil | Yes |
Plant materials | Yes |
Animal bedding | Yes |
White goods (i.e. appliances) | No |
Electronics | Yes |
Laboratory equipment | No |
Furniture | Yes |
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste | No |
Scrap metal | Yes |
Pallets | Yes |
Tires | Yes |
Other (please specify below) | No |
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
---
Optional Fields
Active Recovery and Reuse
---
Recycling Management
No
Does the institution use dual stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Yes
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
---
Contamination and Discard Rates
---
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed:
---
Programs and Initiatives
-Hydration stations installed inside and outside buildings to reduce use of plastic bottles and reduce waste. Total of 34 installed.
-Campus composting program diverts campus green waste (grass clippings, wood chippings, and livestock waste) and converts into usable compost that is used in campus planted areas, agricultural pastures, and cover crop demonstration area.
-Campus composting program diverts campus green waste (grass clippings, wood chippings, and livestock waste) and converts into usable compost that is used in campus planted areas, agricultural pastures, and cover crop demonstration area.
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
---
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste:
---
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
---
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse:
---
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption:
---
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials available online by default rather than printing them:
---
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
---
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s waste minimization and diversion efforts is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Discrepancies in weighted campus users between this field and PRE-5 are due to the numbers being derived from different years, one of which was a pandemic year. For PRE-5, we used data from AY 2019-2020, which was the last academic year where population data was unaffected by COVID pandemic. For this credit, we used data from our baseline (FY 2018-1019) and performance years (FY 2020-2021). Our performance year coincides with the COVID pandemic (and the closure of our campus), which explains the discrepancy in weighted campus users.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.