Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 59.70
Liaison Tamera Jahnke
Submission Date April 5, 2021

STARS v2.2

Missouri State University
OP-2: Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.25 / 8.00 Doug Neidigh
Sustainability Coordinator
Environmental Management
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Gross Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions:
Performance year Baseline year
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from stationary combustion 11,786.83 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 8,926.62 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from other sources 661.98 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 721.20 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported electricity 68,521.73 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 70,692.25 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent
Total 80,970.54 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 80,340.07 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent

Figures needed to determine net carbon sinks:
Performance year Baseline year
Third-party verified carbon offsets purchased 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent
Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets generated 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent
Carbon storage from on-site composting 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent
Carbon storage from non-additional sequestration 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent
Carbon sold or transferred 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent
Net carbon sinks 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 0 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent

A brief description of the carbon sinks, including vendor, project source, verification program and contract timeframes (as applicable):
---

Adjusted net Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions:
Performance year Baseline year
Adjusted net GHG emissions 80,970.54 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 80,340.07 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent

Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Performance year Baseline year
Start date July 1, 2018 July 1, 2016
End date June 30, 2019 June 30, 2017

A brief description of when and why the GHG emissions baseline was adopted:

The university adjusted the energy baseline to FY2017 in order to support continual improvement efforts by establishing a more recent baseline. FY2017 was selected based on a typical operational year, as well as, it included recent significant energy performance improvements.


Figures needed to determine “Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance year Baseline year
Number of students resident on-site 3,344 4,058
Number of employees resident on-site 17 17
Number of other individuals resident on-site 7 7
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment 18,463 18,720
Full-time equivalent of employees 2,104 2,115
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education 6,259 4,132
Weighted Campus Users 11,578.25 13,553

Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user:
Performance year Baseline year
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user 6.99 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent 5.93 Metric Tons of CO2 Equivalent

Percentage reduction in adjusted net Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user from baseline:
0

Gross floor area of building space, performance year:
5,583,224 Gross Square Feet

Floor area of energy intensive building space, performance year:
Floor area
Laboratory space 61,836 Square Feet
Healthcare space 17,865 Square Feet
Other energy intensive space 143,578 Square Feet

EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
5,886,204 Gross Square Feet

Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per unit of EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
0.01 MtCO2e / GSF

A brief description of the institution’s GHG emissions reduction initiatives:
---

Website URL where information about the institution's GHG emissions is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.