| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 57.96 |
| Liaison | Tracey Coronado |
| Submission Date | March 15, 2018 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Missouri State University
PA-5: Assessing Diversity and Equity
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Doug
Neidigh Sustainability Coordinator Environmental Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution engaged in a structured assessment process during the previous three years to improve diversity, equity and inclusion on campus?:
Yes
A brief description of the assessment process and the framework, scorecard(s) and/or tool(s) used:
In March 2015, the University released the Missouri State University Campus and Community Climate Study Report. The Division for Diversity and Inclusion collaborated with Diversity Works, Inc., to conduct the climate study with the establishment of a steering committee of individuals from both campus and the community. The project consisted of the following:
1. Climate survey instruments for both MSU students and employees
2. Informal interviews of MSU administrators, faculty and staff
3. Community interviews and discussion groups
Does the assessment process address campus climate by engaging stakeholders to assess the attitudes, perceptions and behaviors of faculty, staff, administrators and students, including the experiences of underrepresented groups?:
Yes
Does the assessment process address student outcomes related to diversity, equity and success (e.g. graduation/success and retention rates for underrepresented groups)?:
Yes
Does the assessment process address employee outcomes related to diversity and equity (e.g. pay and retention rates for underrepresented groups)?:
Yes
A brief description of the most recent assessment findings and how the results are used in shaping policy, programs and initiatives:
Results have been used to shape policies related to diversity climate, academic climate, institutional attractiveness, micro-aggressions, barriers to enrollment access and financial aid.
Since the release of the final report, the university has initiated efforts to address the findings and recommendations contained therein. Particular emphasis is placed on cultural consciousness/competency of faculty, staff, and administrators as a priority. Also, the 2016-2021 Long Range Plan, completed in 2016 incorporated a diversity and inclusion section as one of the six strategic goals and priorities. During the 5 years of the plan each unit of the university will develop specific goals and tactics that will operationalize the plan, direct how the university will allocated its resources, identify which individuals or groups are accountable for implementation and specify the measures by which the plan will be evaluated.
The Missouri State University 2016-2021 Long Range Plan includes a Diversity and Inclusion section that defines/emphasizes diversity, inclusion, cultural consciousness, competency, inclusive excellence and intersectionality: https://www.missouristate.edu/longrangeplan/diversity-inclusion.htm
The Annual Action Plan delineates the D & I priorities to be addressed and implemented each year: https://www.missouristate.edu/president/enhance-diversity.htm
Are the results of the most recent structured diversity and equity assessment shared with the campus community?:
Yes
A brief description of how the assessment results are shared with the campus community:
Results were publicly posted an the University community was notified. The University administration and the CCCSP Steering Committee invited students, faculty, staff and community members to browse the study’s results and provide feedback about its content.
Are the results (or a summary of the results) of the most recent structured diversity and equity assessment publicly posted?:
Yes
The diversity and equity assessment report or summary:
---
The website URL where the report or summary is publicly posted:
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.