| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 51.41 |
| Liaison | Tracey Coronado |
| Submission Date | April 1, 2015 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Missouri State University
PA-10: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.00 / 1.00 |
Doug
Neidigh Sustainability Coordinator Environmental Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Has the institution conducted an employee satisfaction and engagement survey or other evaluation that meets the criteria for this credit?:
No
None
The percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample:
---
None
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
In 2010 one group of participants of the USA (University Faculty and Staff) Program, a leadership and learning program at the University, conducted a satisfaction survey of the full time faculty and staff and issued their findings. Many of their questions were similar to those on the 2007-08 study described above. This survey had a 46% return rate, showing the interest in our employees in the study and verifying its findings.
In 2007 the University conducted a quality of life survey of the University employees and issued a report of the findings of that report in 2008. Among the questions on that report were questions regarding work satisfaction, adequacy of resources available to perform job duties, quality of supervision, and overall satisfaction.
http://www.missouristate.edu/assets/staffsenate/2007satisfactionassessment.pdf
None
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
In response to the 2007 assessment results, HR implemented several new voluntary benefits, including vision, which was specifically requested in the survey.
The 2013-2014 Climate Study will be used to develop programs and policies for more effective service, recruitment and retention of faculty, staff, students and community members.
None
The year the employee satisfaction and engagement evaluation was last administered:
2,010
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s employee satisfaction and engagement assessment is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.