Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 59.82 |
Liaison | Joanne Wong |
Submission Date | Feb. 10, 2021 |
Mills College
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
![]() |
1.46 / 3.00 |
Joanne
Wong Sustainability Coordinator Campus Facilities |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a GHG emissions inventory within the previous three years that includes all Scope 1 and 2 emissions? :
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
Operational control approach (The Greenhouse Gas Protocol), custom tool.
Conversion factors were used from government agencies such as US Environmental Protection Agency and organizations such as The Climate Registry.
Conversion factors were used from government agencies such as US Environmental Protection Agency and organizations such as The Climate Registry.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
No
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 2,091.88 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 129.03 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
2,220.91
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year (market-based):
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 283.43 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
283.43
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross GHG emissions from biogenic sources, performance year:
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Does the GHG emissions inventory include Scope 3 emissions from the following sources?:
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | Yes | 316.52 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Commuting | Yes | 725.50 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | --- | --- |
Capital goods | --- | --- |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | --- | --- |
Waste generated in operations | --- | --- |
Other sources | --- | --- |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
1,042.02
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
Business travel was accounted in finance records. Commuting data was collected through transportation survey (see OP-16) and calculated.
Has the institution completed an inventory within the previous three years to quantify its air pollutant emissions?:
No
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | --- |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | --- |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | --- |
Particulate matter (PM) | --- |
Ozone (O3) | --- |
Lead (Pb) | --- |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | --- |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | --- |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | --- |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | --- |
Area sources | --- |
Mobile sources | --- |
Commuting | --- |
Off-site electricity production | --- |
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
---
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity (location-based):
---
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.