Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 75.15 |
Liaison | Laura Young |
Submission Date | March 3, 2022 |
Michigan State University
OP-5: Building Energy Efficiency
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.62 / 6.00 |
Laura
Young Sustainability Program Coordinator Administration-EVP-Office of Sustainability |
Part 1. Site energy use per unit of floor area
Performance year energy consumption
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 64,630,820 Kilowatt-hours | 220,520.36 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 15,554,172 Kilowatt-hours | 53,070.83 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, performance year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 7,223,028 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, performance year:
Performance year building space
Floor area of energy intensive space, performance year:
Floor area | |
Laboratory space | 1,865,278 Square feet |
Healthcare space | 169,093 Square feet |
Other energy intensive space | 681,133 Square feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Performance year heating and cooling degree days
Degree days | |
Heating degree days | 6,901 Degree-Days (°F) |
Cooling degree days | 771 Degree-Days (°F) |
Total degree days, performance year:
Performance period
Start date | End date | |
Performance period | July 1, 2018 | June 30, 2019 |
Metric used in scoring for Part 1
Part 2. Reduction in source energy use per unit of floor area
Baseline year energy consumption
STARS 2.2 requires electricity data in kilowatt-hours (kWh). If a baseline has already been established in a previous version of STARS and the institution wishes to continue using it, the electricity data must be re-entered in kWh. To convert existing electricity figures from MMBtu to kWh, simply multiply by 293.07107 MMBtu/kWh.
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 32,046,900 Kilowatt-hours | 109,344.02 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, baseline year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 6,743,147.99 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, baseline year:
Baseline year building space
Baseline period
Start date | End date | |
Baseline period | July 1, 2009 | June 30, 2010 |
A brief description of when and why the energy consumption baseline was adopted:
Source energy
Total energy consumption per unit of floor area:
Site energy | Source energy | |
Performance year | 0.31 MMBtu per square foot | 0.33 MMBtu per square foot |
Baseline year | 0.30 MMBtu per square foot | 0.31 MMBtu per square foot |
Metric used in scoring for Part 2
Optional Fields
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices in regard to energy efficiency:
Building occupant energy engagement events were conducted. These spartan treasure hunts were modelled after GE Treasure Hunts whereby a team of engineers from GE worked with stakeholders from MSU to develop an approach to engaging building occupants in identifying opportunities for improved energy efficiency, behavior changes with respect to sustainability and develop better working relationships between operations staff and departments across campus. Additionally through collaborations with our Environmental Health and Safety Division, a monthly Safe Sustainable Labs meeting was established bringing together building lab facilities staff, departmental representatives, EHS and operations professionals from our Infrastructure Planning and Facilities team. The discussions focused on how to balance safety with sustainability and energy efficiency. Last, over the past few years, various IPF team members from Sustainability and Building Performance Services have sponsored student Capstone Design projects with the Department of Applied engineering. These projects have focused on energy savings and efficiency topics such as a mobile steam insulation calculator, HVAC filer optimization, ideas for changes to campus district energy production and distribution (in conjunction with Johnson Controls, Inc) and the development of an enforceable campus temperature control guideline.
A brief description of energy use standards and controls employed by the institution:
A brief description of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting and other energy-efficient lighting strategies employed by the institution:
The Kellogg and Conference Center initiated a plan in Spring of 2021 for upgrades from high pressure sodium lights to LEDs in its parking ramp; 307 fixtures were replaced with LEDs. The McLane Stadium and Secchia Stadium have LED lights that were installed in the spring of 2019, which are indential to the lighting system at the Spartan Stadium. https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/sports/college/msu/2019/01/03/michigan-state-baseball-softball-lights/2474928002/. In addition, LEDs were installed at the MSU Breslin Student Events Center, with projected energy use reductions of 74%. https://www.musco.com/breslin/. IPF installed roughly 50,000 new LED tubes in existing flourescent-light fixtures in nine campus buildings. https://ipf.msu.edu/about/news/ipf-partnership-consumers-energy-powers-big-savings-msu
A brief description of passive solar heating, geothermal systems, and related strategies employed by the institution:
A brief description of co-generation employed by the institution:
Since the plant is co-generation, about 50 percent of the stored energy in fuel is converted to direct energy. For most conventional electric power plants, that number is only 40. The high efficiency is significant in keeping utility costs low.
MSU is deploying Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine (R.I.C.E.) technology at the T.B. Simon Power Plant which operates at higher efficiency than the traditional generation units currently in use. The enhancements will help further reduce the university's carbon footprint by enabling additional solar energy production from the planned south campus solar farm, as well as positioning the power plant to be able to retire existing generation units that have reached the end of their lifespan. The R.I.C.E. units produce electricity directly from the combustion of natural gas without requiring the co-production of steam and will allow the plant to respond more flexibly to campus demands for steam and electricity. In the spring and fall when steam demand for heating/cooling is lower but electrical demand is high, the plant will be able to use the R.I.C.E. units to produce the additional electricity needed by campus so that extra steam production can be avoided. https://ipf.msu.edu/about/news/rice-helping-reduce-msus-carbon-footprint
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace energy-consuming appliances, equipment, and systems with high efficiency alternatives:
Website URL where information about the institution’s energy conservation and efficiency program is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.