| Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 29.05 |
| Liaison | Elizabeth Masuen |
| Submission Date | March 31, 2016 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Metropolitan Community College
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.26 / 1.00 |
Sally
Hopley Coordinator of Sustainable Practices Campus Planning and Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase office paper that has recycled content and/or is certified to meet multi-criteria sustainability standards for paper?:
No
None
A copy of the paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
---
None
The paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
---
None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed :
---
None
Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on office paper)?:
Yes
None
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
| Expenditure Per Level | |
| 10-29 percent | 5,662 US/Canadian $ |
| 30-49 percent | 9,704 US/Canadian $ |
| 50-69 percent | 9,703 US/Canadian $ |
| 70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label) | 9,703 US/Canadian $ |
| 90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled label) | 5,020 US/Canadian $ |
None
Total expenditures on office paper :
69,131
US/Canadian $
None
The website URL where information about the paper purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
This information is for the 2015 Calendar year based on our Green Reports provided by Office Depot Office Max Greener Reports.
The Office Depot Office Max Greener Reports does not break down into the 30-49, 50-69 category, I have divided the indicated amount spent on the 70-89 percent equally amongst the three categories. $29111/3 = 9703.6 per the above categories.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.