Messiah University
OP-18: Waste Minimization and Diversion

Part 1. Reduction in total waste per person

Institution has implemented source reduction strategies to reduce the total amount of waste generated (materials diverted + materials disposed) per weighted campus user compared to a baseline.

Part 2. Total waste per person

Institution’s total annual waste generation (materials diverted and disposed) is less than the minimum performance threshold of 0.45 tonnes (0.50 short tons) per weighted campus user.

Part 3. Waste diverted from the landfill or incinerator

Institution diverts materials from the landfill or incinerator by recycling, composting, donating or re-selling.

For scoring purposes, up to 10 percent of total waste generated may also be disposed through post-recycling residual conversion. To count, residual conversion must include an integrated materials recovery facility (MRF) or equivalent sorting system to recover recyclables and compostable material prior to conversion.

This credit includes on-campus dining services operated by the institution or the institution’s primary on-site contractor.

Waste includes all materials that the institution discards, intends to discard or is required to discard (i.e., all materials that are recycled, composted, donated, re-sold, or disposed of as trash) except construction, demolition, hazardous, special (e.g., coal ash), universal and non-regulated chemical waste, which are covered in the Construction and Demolition Waste DiversionandHazardous Waste Managementcredits.

Consistent with the U.S Environmental Protection Agency’s Waste Reduction Model (WARM), the on-site reuse of materials is treated as a form of source reduction for scoring purposes. All materials that are reused on campus are automatically recognized in scoring for Part 1 and Part 2 of this credit. To avoid double-counting, reuse therefore does not also contribute to scoring for Part 3 as waste diversion.

This credit applies to all institutions. 

Each part is scored independently. Points earned are calculated according to the formulas below. Please note that users do not have to calculate the number of points earned themselves; points earned will be calculated automatically when the data listed under Reporting Fields is entered in the online Reporting Tool.

Part 1

An institution earns the maximum points of 2.5 points available for Part 1 by reducing its total waste generation by 50 percent or more compared to a baseline. Incremental points are awarded based on the percentage reduction achieved. For example, an institution that reduced the total amount of waste generated by 25 percent would earn 1.25 points (half of the points available for Part 1).

STARS only awards positive points; points will not be deducted if the total amount of waste generated increases rather than decreases during the time period.

Points earned = 5 × { [ ( A / B ) - ( C / D ) ] / ( A / B ) }

A = Total waste generated (diverted + disposed), baseline year

B = Weighted campus users, baseline year

C = Total waste generated (diverted + disposed), performance year

D = Weighted campus users, performance year

Part 2

An institution earns the maximum of 2.5 points available for Part 2 of this credit when its total annual waste generation per weighted campus user is 90 percent less than the minimum performance threshold of 0.46 tonnes (0.50 short tons). Incremental points are awarded based on the institution’s performance between the threshold and the 90 percent target. For example, an institution that generates 0.275 short tons of waste per weighted campus user (45 percent less than the threshold) would earn 1.25 points (half of the points available for Part 2).

Points earned = 2.78 × { [ C - ( A / B ) ] / C }

A = Total waste generated (diverted + disposed), performance year

B = Weighted campus users, performance year

C = Minimum performance threshold (0.46 tonnes or 0.50 short tons)

Part 3

An institution earns the maximum of 3 points available for Part 3 of this credit by diverting 100 percent of waste from the landfill or incinerator through recycling, composting, donating or reselling or by diverting at least 90 percent of waste from the landfill or incinerator and disposing of the remaining residual materials through post-recycling conversion. Incremental points are awarded based on the percentage of waste that is diverted and the percentage of waste that is disposed through post-recycling conversion, as follows:

Points earned = 3 × { [ ( A + B + C ) +  ( F if D ≥ F, else D ) ] / ( A + B + C + D + E ) ] }

A = Materials recycled, performance year

B = Materials composted, performance year

C = Materials donated or re-sold, performance year

D = Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion, performance year

E = Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator, performance year

F = Maximum allowable residual conversion [ 0.1 × ( A + B + C + D + E ) ]

For example, an institution that diverts 40 percent of its waste through recycling, composting, donating or re-selling and disposes of the remaining 60 percent through post-recycling conversion would earn 1.5 points (half of the points available for Part 3 of this credit).

Timeframe

Performance Year

Report the most recent data available from within the three years prior to the anticipated date of submission.  Institutions may use the most recent single year for which data is available or an average from throughout the period. Institutions may choose the annual start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g., fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period.

Report population figures from the same time period as that from which waste generation data are drawn (e.g., the consecutive 12-month or 3-year period that most closely overlaps with the waste generation performance period).

Baseline Year

Report data from the baseline year, which may be:

• Any year from 2005 to the present

• A baseline year, 1990 to 2004, that the institution has adopted as part of its sustainability plans or policies or in the context of other reporting obligations

Recommended best practices for defining a baseline include:

• Using the average of three consecutive years to reduce the impact of outliers.

• Using the same baseline year for multiple credits to reduce reporting requirements. For example, institutions using 2005 for all STARS credits that are baseline-based would only have to calculate baseline weighted campus user data once.

• Ensuring that baseline and performance year data are valid and reliable (e.g., that the data were gathered in the same manner)

Institutions without valid and reliable historical data should use performance year data for both the baseline and performance year. Following this approach, an institution would not be able to claim points for reductions during its first STARS submission, but would be able to use its newly established baseline for subsequent submissions.

Institutions may choose the start and end dates that work best with the data they have (e.g. fiscal or calendar year), as long as data are reported from a consecutive 12-month (or 3-year) period. Report population figures from the same period as that from which waste generation data are drawn (e.g. the consecutive 12-month or 3-year period that most closely overlaps with the waste generation baseline period).

Sampling and Data Standards

Waste figures measured in volume may be converted to weight using the conversion factors provided by the the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the College and University Recycling Council (used for the U.S. Recyclemaina competition), CalRecycle or other state/provincial or national authorities.

To the extent possible, include all waste (diverted + disposed) that was generated by the institution and the institution’s primary on-site dining services contractor (if applicable) when reporting for this credit.  Construction, demolition, electronic, hazardous, special (e.g., coal ash), universal and non-regulated chemical waste, which are covered in the Construction and Demolition Waste Diversion and Hazardous Waste Management credits, are excluded. Electronic waste may be included or excluded, at the institution’s discretion. Agricultural waste may be excluded, provided it is excluded from both the volume of materials diverted and the volume of materials disposed.

If data for the entire campus and/or entire year are not available, institutions may use a representative sample. When taking a sample, strive for consistency between the baseline and performance year.