Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 76.32
Liaison Karen Oberer
Submission Date Dec. 11, 2020

STARS v2.2

McGill University
PA-4: Reporting Assurance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00 Karen Oberer
Sustainability Officer
McGill Office of Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Please note that assured reports are still subject to review by AASHE staff prior to publication, which may require additional revisions. AASHE reserves the right to withhold points for this credit if it is determined that the assurance process was clearly unsuccessful in identifying and resolving inconsistencies or errors (e.g., when AASHE staff identify a significant number of issues that were either not mentioned in the completed review template or not resolved successfully).

Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Yes

Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
External audit

The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Cassandra Lamontagne, Sustainability Coordinator, Office of Sustainability, Concordia University, Montreal

A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Cassandra Lamontagne agreed to act as an external reviewer for McGill's STARS report; once Concordia's STARS report is complete, I, Karen Oberer, will review it in turn.

Cassandra followed the review process set out in the STARS Technical Manual (v. 2.2.). She began to review the initial draft in late August 2020 and the first review was completed Sept. 14, 2020. I carefully reviewed Cassandra's comments and made the appropriate corrections, submitting my second draft on November 5. Cassandra reviewed this draft and sent minor corrections, which were completed on Nov. 10.

Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASH​E:
AASHE_STARS_Letter_of_Affirmation_CL.pdf

Completed STARS Review Template:
STARS_2.2._Review_Template_McGill_20.11.05CL_Final.xlsx

Optional

Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to ​submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
---

Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
---

Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to ​submitting it to AASHE​ (3rd review):
---

Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
---

Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.