| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 51.18 |
| Liaison | Lora Strigens |
| Submission Date | Feb. 13, 2013 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Marquette University
OP-15: Student Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
3.64 / 4.00 |
Andrew
Seifert Projects Assistant Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution's students who use more sustainable commuting options:
91
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s students who commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) as their primary method of transportation:
9
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s students who walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means as their primary method of transportation. Please note that this may include on-campus residents :
---
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s students who vanpool or carpool as their primary method of transportation:
---
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s students who take a campus shuttle or public transportation as their primary method of transportation :
---
None
The percentage (0-100) of institution’s students who use a motorcycle, scooter or moped as their primary method of transportation:
---
None
The website URL where information about alternative transportation is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Calculating total percentage of students using more sustainable commuting options: Office of Sustainability staff first determined the number of students with commuter permits (996); this was then divided by the combined number of FTE and PTE on-campus and off-campus residents and commuters (11,749).
The vast majority of Marquette’s junior and senior level students living in non-university off-campus housing still reside within a one mile radius of campus. These students primarily walk and bike to class. This helps explain why the percentage of students using more sustainable commuting options is so high.
The data used for our calculations is from fall 2012.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.