Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 72.17
Liaison Chris Frantsvog
Submission Date March 1, 2019
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

Luther College
OP-23: Rainwater Management

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 2.00 Jay Uthoff
Director of Facilities
Facilities Management
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Which of the following best describes the institution’s approach to rainwater management?:
Less comprehensive policies, plans or guidelines that incorporate green infrastructure

A brief description of the institution’s green infrastructure and LID practices:

Examples of green infrastructure and LID practices at Luther College include the following:

Permeable paving at Facilities
Retention basin at the CFA
Regent Center Parking and Baker Road drains to Lindeman Pond (instead of into the Upper Iowa River)
Parking lot at Baker goes to a retention basin in front of the commons
Rain Garden at Sampson-Hoffland Laboratories
Permeable Paving in Larsen Parking Lot
Pavers on some roof tops to slow water down
Rain barrels at 629 Center and the Heating Plant
Reestablishment of Gateway Prairie and Jewell Prairie
Enrolled land along the Upper Iowa River in the Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Program

A copy of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines:

A brief description of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines that supports the responses above:

Luther College is committed to considering green infrastructure and LID practices whenever building construction or renovation projects are taking place. Rainwater management is also strongly considered in all parking lot, road and landscape redesigns. Given the college's close proximity to the Upper Iowa River and our call to be stewards of the resources that surround us, we see it as our responsibility to do what we can to minimize the impact of our built environment on surrounding waterways.

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:

Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.