Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 62.47 |
Liaison | Kara Holmstrom |
Submission Date | March 3, 2017 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Luther College
PA-9: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.05 / 4.00 |
Peggy
Lensing Controller OFS |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Option 1: Positive Sustainability Investment
Yes
Total value of the investment pool:
148,964,276
US/Canadian $
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of Holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g. renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 14,815 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g. using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g. a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 1,032,154 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving loan funds that are funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
Mercer is the group responsible for managing Luther College's investments. They reported that of the $500,000 + dollars we have invested through them, $14,815 is invested in sustainable industry in the following ways:
$3,378 is from Park Street Natural Resources II, invested in a renewable energy fund.
$11,436 is from Park Street Natural Resource III, which is invested in a fund called Ecosystem Investment Partners. The description from Ecosystem Investment Partners’ website is as follows, “Ecosystem Investment Partners is a unique private investment manager that delivers the highest quality ecological restoration and conservation projects across the U.S. Through our investment funds, we acquire, restore and permanently protect priority conservation properties, and sell the mitigation credits we generate to customers who must offset their unavoidable environmental impacts.”
Luther currently has $1,032,154 in a Climate Action Fund. The purpose of the Climate Action Fund is to provide necessary financial resources for Luther to achieve the goals in its Climate Action Plan, especially Luther's emission reduction targets adopted by the Board of Regents in 2012. (See attached for Climate Action Fund Spending Policy).
Total value of investment pool for this credit differs from the amount reported for our endowment in IC-2 because we chose to include the value of our Climate Action Fund in this credit. These are non-endowment dollars.
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
0.70
Option 2: Investor Engagement
Yes
Sustainable Investment Policy
No
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
---
None
The sustainable investment policy:
Luther College Social Responsibility Statement
The College's investment objective is to provide sufficient financial resources to sustain a prudent spending policy in support of scholarships, professorships, teaching, research and other purposes, while preserving the real value of the Endowment. To accomplish the objective, the Endowment must be invested and earn a rate of return, over the long-term, that exceeds inflation, a prudent spending amount, and investment management fees and related expenses.
The Endowment typically invests through the use of commingled pools to reduce management fees and transaction costs, increase diversification, and to allow the manager to vote proxies in the best interest of the investors. Commingled pool investors are unable to customize the investment selection process since funds are invested in the manner provided by the investment manager. For donors with responsibility concerns, the College provides socially responsible investment options that they may select or designate.
We are not including this as a "sustainable investment policy" because it is more of a statement than a policy. This statement was developed and approved by the Board of Regents in February 2016.
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
No
None
A brief description of how the policy is applied, including recent examples:
---
Proxy Voting
No
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
---
Shareholder Resolutions
No
None
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
---
Negative Screens / Divestment Efforts
No
None
A brief description of the negative screens and how they have been implemented:
---
None
Approximate percentage of the endowment that the negative screens apply to:
---
Investor Networks
No
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
---
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.