Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 47.51 |
Liaison | Kara Holmstrom |
Submission Date | May 1, 2014 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Luther College
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.70 / 1.00 |
Maren
Stumme-Diers Assistant Sustainability Coordinator Environmental Studies |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase office paper that has recycled content and/or is certified to meet multi-criteria sustainability standards for paper?:
Yes
None
A copy of the paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
---
None
The paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
https://www.luther.edu/sustainability/waste-recycling/policy/paper_purchasing/
None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed :
The Luther College Documents Center is in charge of paper purchasing for all offices/ departments, and order only FSC-certified 50% post-consumer fiber content white copier paper or higher. The only exception is FSC-certified colored copier paper with 30% post-consumer content in 8.5 x 11, 8.5 x 14, and 11 x 17 inch sizes, which is available upon request. If a department purchases paper elsewhere, they must adhere to the 50% rule or the purchase will not be covered by the college.
None
Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on office paper)?:
Yes
None
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
Expenditure Per Level | |
10-29 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
30-49 percent | 500 US/Canadian $ |
50-69 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label) | 37,440 US/Canadian $ |
90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled label) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
None
Total expenditures on office paper :
49,940
US/Canadian $
None
The website URL where information about the paper purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.