Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 82.81 |
Liaison | Aaron Durnbaugh |
Submission Date | April 12, 2023 |
Loyola University Chicago
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Aaron
Durnbaugh Director of Sustainability Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Yes
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
External audit
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Andrew Mitchell, Asst. Vice-Chancellor and Director of Sustainability, UIC
Liz Bosarge, Program Director, UIC
Liz Bosarge, Program Director, UIC
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
UIC and Loyola agreed to swap review services.
Loyola provided data entry access to their STARS Report.
As groups of credits were completed (10-15 at a time), Loyola would inform UIC and they would conduct their review.
As those credit groups were finished, UIC would inform Loyola of any revisions or improvements they suggested.
Once all credits had been reviewed and updated, UIC agreed and the review document was published and uploaded to this page.
Loyola provided data entry access to their STARS Report.
As groups of credits were completed (10-15 at a time), Loyola would inform UIC and they would conduct their review.
As those credit groups were finished, UIC would inform Loyola of any revisions or improvements they suggested.
Once all credits had been reviewed and updated, UIC agreed and the review document was published and uploaded to this page.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
---
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
---
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
---
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.