Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 47.76
Liaison Sarah Temple
Submission Date March 1, 2018
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

Louisiana State University
AC-11: Open Access to Research

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 0.00 / 2.00 Sarah Temple
Manager
Campus Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

How many of the institution’s research-producing divisions are covered by a published open access policy that ensures that versions of future scholarly articles by faculty and staff are deposited in a designated open access repository? (All, Some or None):
All

Which of the following best describes the open access policy? (Mandatory or Voluntary):
Voluntary (strictly opt-in)

Does the institution provide financial incentives to support faculty members with article processing and other open access publication charges?:
No

A brief description of the open access policy, including the date adopted, any incentives or supports provided, and the repository(ies) used:
---

A copy of the institution's open access policy:
---

The institution's open access policy:
Brief Description of the open access policy: 1. For federally funded research, faculty are required to adhere to the federal open access standards 2. For funded research, faculty may be required to some form of open access if the funding agency requires it 3. For unfunded research, faculty may choose to make their work open access 4. December 9, 2016 http://www.lsu.edu/bos/docs/LSU-Bylaws-and-Regulations-as-adopted-December-9-2016.pdf (Section 7-7)

None
The website URL where the open access repository is available:

Optional Fields 

Estimated percentage of scholarly articles published annually by the institution’s faculty and staff that are deposited in a designated open access repository (0-100):
---

A brief description of how the institution’s library(ies) support open access to research:
---

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.