Lewis & Clark College
AC-8: Responsible Research and Innovation
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
Reporter |
Amy
Dvorak Sustainability Manager Facilities |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
8.1 Published ethical code of conduct for research
Yes
Online location of the institution’s ethical code of conduct for research:
Copy of the institution’s ethical code of conduct for research:
---
The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:
1
8.2 Recognition of integrated, community-based, and extra-academic research
Yes
Description or text of the promotion/tenure guidelines or policies that explicitly recognize integrated research:
Do the promotion/tenure guidelines or policies that recognize integrated research cover all of the institution’s research-producing academic divisions?:
Yes
Does the institution have published promotion or tenure guidelines or policies that give explicit positive recognition to community-based research?:
No
Description or text of the promotion/tenure guidelines or policies that explicitly recognize community-based research:
---
Do the promotion/tenure guidelines or policies that recognize community-based research cover all of the institution’s research-producing academic divisions?:
No
Does the institution have published promotion or tenure guidelines or policies that give explicit positive recognition to research impact or reach outside of academic journals?:
Yes
Description or text of the promotion/tenure guidelines or policies that explicitly recognize research impact or reach outside of academic journals:
https://www.lclark.edu/live/profiles/21172-section-iiia5-cpt-assessment-of-tenure-files-
- Publications and presentations
-
- Publications of work initiated before the candidate’s time of hire are considered as part of their scholarly output, but publications of work initiated since a candidate’s hire are an essential demonstration of their ability to balance this work with teaching and performing College service.
- Peer-reviewed publications receive the largest weight in the CPT assessment. They include (i) articles that are published in peer-reviewed professional journals, and (ii) books published by presses that employ peer review.
- Other publications that receive smaller weights in the CPT assessment include (i) book chapters, (ii) articles in non-refereed journals that are recognized by peers as high-quality journals, (iii) book reviews.
- Presentations at conferences are useful to demonstrate the status of work in progress and, when such contributions are invited, to demonstrate a candidate’s standing in their field.
-
Do the promotion/tenure guidelines or policies that recognize research impact or reach outside of academic journals cover all of the institution’s research-producing academic divisions?:
Yes
If Yes to any of the above, provide at least one form of evidence (website URL or document). If reporting on multiple guidelines or policies, provide the best available example and/or a website that provides an overview of promotion/tenure for academic employees.
Copy of the institution’s promotion/tenure guidelines or policies:
---
The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:
3
8.3 Inter-campus collaboration for responsible research and innovation
No
Description of the institution’s inter-campus collaborations for responsible research and innovation:
---
The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:
0
8.4 Support for open access publishing
No
Narrative and/or website URL providing an overview of the open access repository:
---
Does the institution have one or more published policies that require its employees to publish scholarly works open access or archive final post-peer reviewed versions of scholarly works in an open access repository?:
No
Do the open access policies cover all of the institution’s research-producing academic divisions?:
No
Text or online location of the institution’s open access policies:
---
Copy of the institution’s open access policies:
---
Does the institution provide an open access article processing charge (APC) fund for employees?:
No
Narrative and/or website URL providing an overview of the open access APC fund:
---
Does the institution negotiate or participate in transformative open access agreements that are consistent with ESAC guidelines?:
No
Narrative and/or website URL providing an overview of the institution’s transformative open access agreements with publishers:
---
The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:
0
Optional documentation
---
Additional documentation for this credit:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.