| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 51.63 |
| Liaison | Dwayne Doornbosch |
| Submission Date | June 24, 2021 |
Langara College
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Dwayne
Doornbosch Director Facilities Facilities |
Please note that assured reports are still subject to review by AASHE staff prior to publication, which may require additional revisions. AASHE reserves the right to withhold points for this credit if it is determined that the assurance process was clearly unsuccessful in identifying and resolving inconsistencies or errors (e.g., when AASHE staff identify a significant number of issues that were either not mentioned in the completed review template or not resolved successfully).
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
- David Pereira, Manager Space Planning, VP Academic Office, British Columbia Institute of Technology
- Colin Chan, Associate Director, Facilities & Campus Development, British Columbia Institute of Technology
- Mariya Chugay, SDG Ambassador, British Columbia Institute of Technology
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
1) Internal quality check
In this phase, an internal STARS team made up of a co-op student (Ikpal Singh), several members of the Facilities department (Dwayne Doornbosch, Patricia Baker, and Raymond Yeung), and the external consultant retained to coordinate the submission (Devon Miller) conducted a detailed review of the submission to fix any typos, grammatical errors, and data/information inconsistencies.
2) External audit
Following step 1, the formal reporting assurance process took place, which involved a review by the staff from the British Columbia Institute of Technology listed above. The results of that review is captured in the attached STARS Review Template and Statement of Affirmation.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Optional
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.