| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 53.24 |
| Liaison | Alicia Gowan |
| Submission Date | June 18, 2024 |
Kwantlen Polytechnic University
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Alicia
Gowan Sustainability Specialist Campus and Community Planning |
Please note that assured reports are still subject to review by AASHE staff prior to publication, which may require additional revisions. AASHE reserves the right to withhold points for this credit if it is determined that the assurance process was clearly unsuccessful in identifying and resolving inconsistencies or errors (e.g., when AASHE staff identify a significant number of issues that were either not mentioned in the completed review template or not resolved successfully).
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Internal Review: Lucas Ozols-Mongeau, Manager of Planning & Sustainability,
KPU External Audit: Christine Pinkman, STARS Project Manager, British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT); Christina Olsen, Sustainability Manager, BCIT
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Both the Internal Review and External Audit involved the STARS 2.2 Review Template to guide the assurance process. The internal review was conducted by an administrator of the Campus and Community Planning Department. They were not involved in the STARS data collection process prior to the review. The external audit was conducted by sustainability employees at the British Columbia Institute of Technology. When issues were identified by both parties, they were noted in the STARS 2.2 Review Template and were then addressed by KPU's STARS liaison, Alicia Gowan. Changes addressed were then recorded in the Review Template.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Optional
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.