Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 35.38 |
Liaison | Rachael Rost-Allen |
Submission Date | June 17, 2014 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Johnson County Community College
PA-3: Governance
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.30 / 3.00 |
Jay
Antle Executive Director Center for Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Do all enrolled students, regardless of type or status, have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies (through direct participation or the election of representatives)?:
Yes
A brief description of the mechanisms through which students have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies:
The JCCC Student Senate is elected by the student body and then elects representatives that serve on advisory groups like the JCCC Foundation Board and provide input to (although not a formal seat on) the Board of Trustees.
Is there at least one student representative on the institution’s governing body who was elected by peers or appointed by a representative student body or organization?:
No
A brief description of student representation on the governing body, including how the representatives are selected:
---
Do students have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following?:
Yes or No | |
Establishing organizational mission, vision, and/or goals | No |
Establishing new policies, programs, or initiatives | No |
Strategic and long-term planning | No |
Existing or prospective physical resources | No |
Budgeting, staffing and financial planning | No |
Communications processes and transparency practices | No |
Prioritization of programs and projects | No |
A brief description of the formal student role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years:
---
Do all staff, regardless of type or status, have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies (through direct participation or the election of representatives)?:
No
A brief description of the mechanisms through which all staff have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies:
---
Is there at least one non-supervisory staff representative on the institution’s governing body who was elected by peers or appointed by a representative staff body or organization?:
No
A brief description of non-supervisory staff representation on the governing body, including how the representatives are selected:
---
Do non-supervisory staff have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following? :
Yes or No | |
Establishing organizational mission, vision, and/or goals | No |
Establishing new policies, programs, or initiatives | No |
Strategic and long-term planning | No |
Existing or prospective physical resources | No |
Budgeting, staffing and financial planning | No |
Communications processes and transparency practices | No |
Prioritization of programs and projects | No |
A brief description of the formal staff role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years:
---
Do all faculty, regardless of type or status, have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies (through direct participation or the election of representatives)?:
Yes
A brief description of the mechanisms through which all faculty (including adjunct faculty) have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies:
Faculty Senate and Faculty Association
Is there at least one teaching or research faculty representative on the institution’s governing body who was elected by peers or appointed by a representative faculty body or organization?:
No
A brief description of faculty representation on the governing body, including how the representatives are selected:
---
Do faculty have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following?:
Yes or No | |
Establishing organizational mission, vision, and/or goals | No |
Establishing new policies, programs, or initiatives | Yes |
Strategic and long-term planning | No |
Existing or prospective physical resources | No |
Budgeting, staffing and financial planning | Yes |
Communications processes and transparency practices | No |
Prioritization of programs and projects | Yes |
A brief description of the formal faculty role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years:
Faculty run the campuses Educational Affairs Committee which oversees and prioritizes academic programs. Faculty chairs help make decisions about staffing and budgeting.
The website URL where information about the institution’s governance structure is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.