| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 60.07 |
| Liaison | Martin Sanchez |
| Submission Date | June 29, 2024 |
Tecnológico de Monterrey – Campus Puebla
OP-9: Landscape Management
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.00 / 2.00 |
Total campus area:
Figures required to calculate the total area of managed grounds:
| Area (double-counting is not allowed) | |
| Area managed organically, without the use of inorganic fertilizers and chemical pesticides, fungicides and herbicides | 16.64 Acres |
| Area managed in accordance with an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program that uses selected chemicals only when needed | 0 Acres |
| Area managed using conventional, chemical-based landscape management practices | 0 Acres |
| Total area of managed grounds | 16.64 Acres |
If the total area of managed grounds is less than the total campus area, provide:
Organic program
If reporting an organic program, provide:
Campus Puebla does not uses chemical pesticides for the landscape managament. The Campus only uses biodegradable organic solutions based with citric acids and manure. The landscape also uses treated water for irrigation.
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program
If reporting an IPM program, provide:
A brief description of the IPM program:
Optional Fields
A brief description of the institution's approach to hydrology and water use:
A brief description of the institution's approach to landscape materials management and waste minimization:
Campus Puebla has a composting system in place using the grass mowed and the leaves, leaving them to rot, putting water and stirring, until it disintegrates and becomes fertilizer that helps green areas at Campus.
A brief description of the institution's approach to energy-efficient landscape design:
A brief description of other sustainable landscape management practices employed by the institution:
Website URL where information about the institution’s sustainable landscape management program is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.