Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 60.07 |
Liaison | Martin Sanchez |
Submission Date | June 29, 2024 |
Tecnológico de Monterrey – Campus Puebla
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.98 / 3.00 |
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
Our National Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Report , which is published annually, strictly adheres to the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol) and the Annual Operation Certificate (COA) required by the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources in Mexico(SEMARNAT).
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
For our Annual GHG Emissions Report verification processes for our University we asked the help of Dr. Ana Yael Vanoye. Dr. Vanoye is a Professor and Associate Researcher at Tecnologico de Monterrey and has more than 15+ years experience creating, analizing and presenting sustainability KPIs for diverse institutions, governments and universities. Every year Dr. Vanoye helps us validating and analizing the generated data alongside opportunities and strenghts in our repport.
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 89.76 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 36 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 125 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | Yes | 110 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Commuting | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Capital goods | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
In 2023 we completed our first national Scope 3 Emissions Screening following the GHG Protocol. However, being a nationwide effort the figures reported above cover all operations from all the Campuses at Tec de Monterrey. We calculate only business travel category per campus. At this time we do not have a full Scope 3 Emissions screening per Campus.
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | 0 Tons |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | 0 Tons |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | 0 Tons |
Particulate matter (PM) | 0 Tons |
Ozone (O3) | 0 Tons |
Lead (Pb) | 0 Tons |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | 0 Tons |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | 0 Tons |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | 0 Tons |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | --- |
Area sources | --- |
Mobile sources | --- |
Commuting | --- |
Off-site electricity production | --- |
Optional Fields
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.