Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 68.02 |
Liaison | Maxine Dandois-Fafard |
Submission Date | Nov. 10, 2023 |
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS)
OP-5: Building Energy Efficiency
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
3.06 / 6.00 |
Olivier
Picard Director, material resources department Administration |
Part 1. Site energy use per unit of floor area
Performance year energy consumption
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 34,559,535 Kilowatt-hours | 117,917.13 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, performance year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 123,759.23 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0.49 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, performance year:
Performance year building space
Floor area of energy intensive space, performance year:
Floor area | |
Laboratory space | 26,789 Square meters |
Healthcare space | 0 Square meters |
Other energy intensive space | 789.01 Square meters |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Performance year heating and cooling degree days
Degree days | |
Heating degree days | 4,162 Degree-Days (°C) |
Cooling degree days | 400 Degree-Days (°C) |
Total degree days, performance year:
Performance period
Start date | End date | |
Performance period | May 1, 2021 | April 30, 2022 |
Metric used in scoring for Part 1
Part 2. Reduction in source energy use per unit of floor area
Baseline year energy consumption
STARS 2.2 requires electricity data in kilowatt-hours (kWh). If a baseline has already been established in a previous version of STARS and the institution wishes to continue using it, the electricity data must be re-entered in kWh. To convert existing electricity figures from MMBtu to kWh, simply multiply by 293.07107 MMBtu/kWh.
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 37,344,780 Kilowatt-hours | 127,420.39 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, baseline year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 172,466.58 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, baseline year:
Baseline year building space
Baseline period
Start date | End date | |
Baseline period | May 1, 2007 | April 30, 2008 |
A brief description of when and why the energy consumption baseline was adopted:
Source energy
Total energy consumption per unit of floor area:
Site energy | Source energy | |
Performance year | 2.39 MMBtu per square meter | 3.56 MMBtu per square meter |
Baseline year | 2.79 MMBtu per square meter | 3.97 MMBtu per square meter |
Metric used in scoring for Part 2
Optional Fields
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices in regard to energy efficiency:
The projected annual savings from the implementation of energy reduction initiatives in our laboratories in Quebec is $61,000, which is approximately 20% of the current energy costs. This is reflected in more than 1,150,000 kWh (34%) and over 50,000 m3 (34%), equivalent to 6,000 GJ (34%). These interventions will contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by more than 96 tonnes of CO2eq (34%). The estimated investment required for implementing these guidelines is $51,000. The implementation phase alone has a payback period of (10) months.
In Montreal, on the UCS campus, the projected annual savings amount to approximately $26,400, which is roughly 4.5% of the current energy costs. This is reflected in more than 136,000 kWh (2%) and over 52,500 m3 (20%), equivalent to 2,500 GJ (7%). These measures will contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by over 99 tonnes of CO2eq (20%). The estimated investment required for implementing these guidelines is $17,800. Therefore, the implementation phase alone has a return on investment period of (8) months.
On Montreal campus also, the guidelines were revised three years ago so that outdoor air no longer enters the buildings between 8 PM and 6 AM in order to avoid heating or cooling the spaces during these hours.
A brief description of energy use standards and controls employed by the institution:
In the Quebec city building, we have a heating reduction program from 6:00 PM to 5:00 AM. Additionally, the two Quebec City buildings participates in Hydro-Québec's Power Management Program (GDP) during the winter. For the past 5-6 years, control sequences have been implemented (heating shutdown during peak periods, heating solely using the building's thermal mass).
A brief description of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting and other energy-efficient lighting strategies employed by the institution:
In the Quebec City buildings campus, the majority of the lighting consists of T8 fluorescents, and all room lighting is controlled by motion detectors.
A brief description of passive solar heating, geothermal systems, and related strategies employed by the institution:
Honeywell Canada (a company that offers building management services, security equipment, among others) controls INRS buildings and provides annual energy consumption reports.
A brief description of co-generation employed by the institution:
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace energy-consuming appliances, equipment, and systems with high efficiency alternatives:
The community agrees to adapt and reduce its comfort zone during power reduction days when Hydro-Québec's power management program is in operation.
Recommissioning was done in our Quebec City buildings in 2015. In our laboratories at the technology park in Quebec City, the projected annual savings from the recommissioning amounts to approximately $61,000, which is roughly 20% of the current energy costs. This translates to over 1,150,000 kWh (34%) and more than 50,000 m3 (34%), equivalent to 6,000 GJ (34%). These actions will contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by over 96 tonnes of CO2eq (34%).
In the Quebec City building, the projected annual savings from the implementation of these measures amount to approximately $26,400, which is approximately 4.5% of the current energy costs. This translates to over 136,000 kWh (2%) and more than 52,500 m3 (20%), equivalent to 2,500 GJ (7%). These actions will contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by over 99 tonnes of CO2eq (20%).
Website URL where information about the institution’s energy conservation and efficiency program is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Electricity data comes from the EnerUNIV form submitted to the Ministry of Education each year, and the data is obtained from the electricity and natural gas bills from our suppliers. For diesel fuel, we rely on estimated fillings provided by the building managers.
Heating degree day figures come from https://portfoliomanager.energystar.gov/pm/degreeDaysCalculator, and the area figures are sourced from COBA.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.